Neck preferences, but width, neck thickness and profile, fret size...

PFDarkside said:
5 months later I haven’t made a decision. What to do! I’m thinking 1-5/8” Wolfgang or SRV, 10-16”, SS6150 frets.


Also, fatback and boat neck guys, 1”? Do standard Fender necks make you cringe?
Click to expand...

Generally no, but it depends on the neck and maybe how I play the guitar in question?

My Partscaster Tele has a MIM Blacktop neck which I believe is around .830-.850" at the 1st fret with a 1.65" nut, 9.5" radius, and 22 medium jumbo frets. This neck is about as thin as I can really get along with, those super skinny necks on some MIJ Fenders just aren't for me. Honestly when it comes to typical Fender necks, 7.25" radius bugs me more than the back shape on most of them. I also really dislike Gibson's 60s-style slim taper neck, and most Ibanez necks, while I own 3 mid-80s MIJ Charvels.
 
I am sort of in the same boat. But every few days the picture is a little clearer. I know what kind of neck and contour I am getting...I am still fuzzy on the color of the body. I obviously am not ordering the body, at least, until what I want comes in sharper focus.
Also, note that Warmoth is way behind on orders due to the pandemic, and it might be months to get any custom work (my stuff is gonna be custom).
 
Mincer said:
I am sort of in the same boat. But every few days the picture is a little clearer. I know what kind of neck and contour I am getting...I am still fuzzy on the color of the body. I obviously am not ordering the body, at least, until what I want comes in sharper focus.
Also, note that Warmoth is way behind on orders due to the pandemic, and it might be months to get any custom work (my stuff is gonna be custom).
Click to expand...

Tangerine color superstrat with a maple neck, H-H, reverse headstock.

Thats what I'd do.
 
PFDarkside said:
5 months later I haven’t made a decision. What to do! I’m thinking 1-5/8” Wolfgang or SRV, 10-16”, SS6150 frets.


Also, fatback and boat neck guys, 1”? Do standard Fender necks make you cringe?
Click to expand...

Nope. I can get along with standard Fender necks just fine. It's about the shoulder at that point. Wizard necks and even the later 80's Kramer necks are too thin for me (flat back with little side shoulder). Keep it a C and I'm good. Gibson's Slim 60's profile is even fine. The SRV neck is sweet as I've played some Fender SRV Strats and the Wolfgang feels amazing. If I were to swap the neck out on my Baretta, it would have the EVH profile for sure.
 
Last edited:
ErikH said:
Nope. I can get along with standard Fender necks just tine. It's about the shoulder at that point. Wizard necks and even the later 80's Kramer necks are too thin for me (flat back with little side shoulder). Keep it a C and I'm good. Gibson's Slim 60's profile is even fine. The SRV neck is sweet as I've played some Fender SRV Strats and the Wolfgang feels amazing. If I were to swap the neck out on my Baretta, it would have the EVH profile for sure.
Click to expand...

Ok, I see. I think I am the same way, the shoulder is everything. I hate the D profile, thin with too much shoulder is not my thing. But Vs are odd too. I used to hate them but I’ve got a Japanese 52 Tele and a Martin V series that have different V-ish tapers and they are not ideal but pretty good. I’m thinking unfinished roasted maple would let me sand down any offensive shoulders. Too small and you can’t do anything. I’m also thinking that 1-5/8”’makes thicker necks much more manageable. That Tele above in 1-11/16” might be a bit much.
 
PFDarkside said:
Ok, I see. I think I am the same way, the shoulder is everything. I hate the D profile, thin with too much shoulder is not my thing. But Vs are odd too. I used to hate them but I’ve got a Japanese 52 Tele and a Martin V series that have different V-ish tapers and they are not ideal but pretty good. I’m thinking unfinished roasted maple would let me sand down any offensive shoulders. Too small and you can’t do anything. I’m also thinking that 1-5/8”’makes thicker necks much more manageable. That Tele above in 1-11/16” might be a bit much.
Click to expand...

My boatneck contour necks have 1 5/8" nut widths. As I mentioned in my post from August, I had one that was 1 11/16" but it didn't feel as comfortable. It felt "off". It was the nut width. I sold it and got a roasted maple neck with the same profile but the narrower nut. Feels perfect.
 
I really like the Wolfgang neck profile that Warmoth does. 1 and 11/16ths nut, and with 6100 frets. It's asymmetric profile is the best of both worlds. It is chunky when you want to wrap your thumb over the top and doesn't cramp up your hands when playing rhythm for long stretches, but it's thin when you put your thumb to the back of the neck and want to play fast solos. Just lovely. Everyone who picks the guitar up likes it.
 
Since I already owned several different types of guitars when I started building, I’ve been relatively comfortable with a few types of necks and started building to experiment with things I normally hadn’t found in a store.

When I did my first Warmoth build, I got option paralysis. At that point, I wasn’t even sure what I really expected, or wanted.

That first build was a basic tele. So, I ended up choosing what I thought would fit the motif, and chose a 24.75 scale (personal preference), 1 11/16 nut width (because Warmoth mentioned it was pretty much “industry standard”) maple boatneck (V) with a pao ferro fretboard (for visual interest, over maple), satin nitro finish and standard 6150 frets. I like the neck and the guitar plays great, but I tend favor humbuckers, which leaves this one home unless I want that sound.

This helped start to narrow in my preference for the 1 11/16 nut width, 24.75 scale neck and satin nitro finish. These have carried on into the next two necks.

The next one was easier. I was going for a mahogany soloist body shreddy rock guitar. I knew I wanted a thinner neck profile, but not as thin as the wizard. This one got a 24.75 scale mahogany standard thin neck with an ebony fretboard and my first run at stainless steel 6150 frets. It’s fairly close to my Jackson Dinkys’ necks in feel, which has been kind of “home base” for me, as those were my first really good guitars and what I “grew up” playing.

The most recent build was intended to be more in between the first two, but still leaning toward the super Strat genre, but closer to the feel my recent purchases of Les Pauls. This one got a 24.75 scale maple on maple 59 round back neck, with stainless steel 6105 frets. For some reason, this feels a lot like home. I like the little extra meat it has.

The 6150 stainless frets and 59 round back shape will likely become my standards, too. I have been wanting to try the Wolfgang profile, though.

These experiments have brought me to help me form my preferences for my future builds, but like anything else my journey, is not yours.
 
superpete said:
the kicker is every choice you make plays into the next, so you may like the srv contour at 1 11/16, but at 1 5/8 it feels completely different!
Click to expand...

This all day. You get the illusion of having total control over everything, but these things tend to take on a different personality when they're all together. "The whole is greater than the sum of its parts" and all that. If you go into it knowing that it might not turn out the way you expect, even if you spec it EXACTLY how you want, then you'll probably end up with a righteous neck. If you expect it to be perfect simply because you are getting a say over every detail, you may not be very satisfied. It'll be a nice neck no matter what, just a matter of what your expectations are and how you plan to react to it.
 
alex1fly said:
This all day. You get the illusion of having total control over everything, but these things tend to take on a different personality when they're all together. "The whole is greater than the sum of its parts" and all that. If you go into it knowing that it might not turn out the way you expect, even if you spec it EXACTLY how you want, then you'll probably end up with a righteous neck. If you expect it to be perfect simply because you are getting a say over every detail, you may not be very satisfied. It'll be a nice neck no matter what, just a matter of what your expectations are and how you plan to react to it.
Click to expand...

I understand and agree. I’m thinking by choosing finishes that don’t lock it into a specific guitar, it becomes more flexible. (If I order a matching headstock or body color finish on the back of the neck, it’s pretty much locked in. ;)
 
PFDarkside said:
I understand and agree. I’m thinking by choosing finishes that don’t lock it into a specific guitar, it becomes more flexible. (If I order a matching headstock or body color finish on the back of the neck, it’s pretty much locked in. ;)
Click to expand...

Get an unfinished roasted maple neck that's slightly larger than you think you want. Then you can just whack it down with sandpaper if it doesn't feel good. :P
 
My Epiphone Wildkat's neck, is the "best" I've had, and owned-

It's a rather thick C shape. I wouldn't mind if it was even thicker; I like thick necks, round necks-

(and do not like thin necks, at all)

:) \m/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Ascension
NOS Wasburn Chicago Custom body and neck project
Replies
7
Views
90
Artie
Artie
Chris EmCee
RTM neck pairing question
Replies
8
Views
97
Overlord
Overlord
Rex_Rocker
Which guitars have neck profiles similar to the ESP/LTD Thin U?
Replies
13
Views
224
Ashurbanipal
Ashurbanipal
blakejcan
Fender Neck Pocket depth.....is it really 5/8"?
Replies
13
Views
199
RanchManSandy
R
alex1fly
Swap 3-way for 5-way in a Tele
Replies
2
Views
42
alex1fly
alex1fly
Back
Top