You mean like 'Just because GC has the right to destroy small businesses, doesn't mean it is right"
Or the way "Gibson has the right to demand that GC purchase a ton of crappy instruments and force you to shop there, but that doesn't mean it is right"
Or do you mean the way "GC will shaft you at every opportunity if they can get away with it because they have the right, but that doesn't make it right"
Or the way that "Many businesses will bait and switch on sales like that because they have the...." Oh wait - that's actually illegal.
No Effs are given about the morality here. Bruce, I'll send you some Jack Daniels and Ambien if keeps you up at night....
Nothing unethical about it at all. They, as a seller, are responsible for making sure that they price their product correctly. If they advertise it at a particular price, then that's what they have to sell it for. Caveat Mercator.
I never asked you for your support. Or your moral narrative on my purchase. I work in eCommerce I might know a bit more about retailers than you do. Retailers know they have high and low-value customers. There are bargain hunters that will only shop for clearance items and deals. Retailers know they will take a loss on these customers. The low-value customers are offset by the high-value customers who spend large amounts of capital and buy everything they see. In some ways retail is like a casino, some walk through the doors with a win others with a loss. These wins-losses are built into their prices, the house always wins.
In regards to the law, you are wrong once again. My only recourse would not be to sue the retailer. As consumers, we have protections and resources available to us. On the state level, it is our Attorney General's office on the federal level it is the FTC. A complaint can be filed with either body online within minutes. Once a complaint is filed (for free) it is the decision of that body which party is in the right and if restitution should be made to the consumer. The retailer honored the price not because they were willing to, but because they had to. Please remember they offered me a $200 gift card originally. If I did not know the laws and my rights as a consumer once again the house would have won.
Also, I think you need to look up the definition of "ethical", "conforming to accepted standards of conduct". None of my conduct was deceitful, dishonest or calculated. I saw a guitar I was interested in, inquired and ultimately purchased. If you are not comfortable with the pricing, purchase or process that is on you, and your "high moral standards".
For your information, I AM a retailer
DUDE.
DUUUUUUUUUDE. Buy yourself a lottery ticket!
You better post some porn of this $400 LP GT or I’ll be a sad panda.
UPS said it is getting delivered today buy the end of the day but the shipping information hasn't updated. I am going to hang out at work and get some work done until 6. If it is not here by then I am going home pissed. I have appointments all day tomorrow so I will be out when we get our usual UPS delivery. UPS online keeps saying it is one town over.
Balls. Fyi, I think they deliver til 8.
My boss just stopped by my office he is waiting on a powered speaker for his keyboard setup. He is a bit ticked with UPS right now himself. I am not waiting here until 8, no way.
For a LP GT? I would.
Yeah - we need picks TONIGHT!!!!
Maybe they delivered it to Guitardoc by mistake?