Sirion
New member
Strange enough I have never played a SD-1. My best friend has one in mothballs since he bought his multi-effect, I should borrow it.
I cannot imagine that you wouldn't like an SD-1 into a Marshall.

Strange enough I have never played a SD-1. My best friend has one in mothballs since he bought his multi-effect, I should borrow it.
I cannot imagine that you wouldn't like an SD-1 into a Marshall.![]()
The Ultimate Drive is the OCD clone?my Joyo Ultimate Drive
didnt like single coils into my Solid State Laney at all
but into my Carvin Belair, it was awesome
I don't know if there's something wrong with my current one, but it struggles to get unity gain into my Egnater. Sort of anti-climactic to step on a dirt pedal and have LESS volume....
Larry
Yeah, many Boss pedals are like that. I'd actually say most Boss gain pedals are like that, especially with high output pickups. Nothing wrong with yours. My SD-1 and my Wylde Overdrive are like that too. Honestly, my TS808 is on the edge of being like that too.
But I don't find that to be a problem with the SD-1 because the SD-1 is normally meant to be used on top of an already distorted amp. IMO, the SD-1, much like any other TS-type, sounds kinda weak, and very pedal-like when used in front of a completely clean channel anyway.
The Ultimate Drive is the OCD clone?
A TS-type (the SD-1 is a TS-type) sounds great boosting one of those.
Ah, yeah, I agree.I was pointing out how the amp makes a difference in how the pedal sounds
So what I'm getting is that the SD-1 is more an EQ than an actual distortion pedal?
Larry
It's more of a non-transparent overdrive pedal to add character to amps, I'd say. It's EQ and some mild clipping/compression. It is another take on the Tube Screamer thing. The circuit is pretty similar to the TS808, just with a few values shifted, and asymmetrical clipping rather than symmetrical.So what I'm getting is that the SD-1 is more an EQ than an actual distortion pedal?
Larry
In the past, everytime I've tried to get along with an SD-1 instead of something with symmetric clipping, it's been too bright and harsh, but for this it pushed things perfectly. It cut enough bass and pushed enough upper mids to give a giant crunch. All I had to do was dial back a bit of gain on the Revv, and there it was. This is going to be fun. Now I get it.
"Well, why didn't you just dial in the amp without so much bass?" And the answer is, "Because it didn't sound good that way."
I have both. The ZW is not night and day from the SD-1. The ZW does seem to have a very slightly deeper bass, but the ZW also has more aggressive highs that don't make it seem like it's fatter at all. They all cut bass. My TS808 sounds way fatter than either the ZW (in either mode) or the SD-1, and it still cuts bass.The ZW OD is an SD1 which doesn't lose any bass when you turn the tone knob to the right. You should try it. To me, there's no reason owning an SD1 if you have a ZW OD unless you intentionally want to lose bass.
Another great "OD" for pushing a slightly dirty amp would be a DS1
The ZW OD is an SD1 which doesn't lose any bass when you turn the tone knob to the right. You should try it. To me, there's no reason owning an SD1 if you have a ZW OD unless you intentionally want to lose bass.
Another great "OD" for pushing a slightly dirty amp would be a DS1
It's a single resistor difference. Interesting how a single resistor transforms a pedal. It's not like it turns it into a Klon or a Rat, but it certainly takes it from a straight very slightly tweaked SD-1 clone into something more TS-ish.I do know at some point the ZW got the switch inside where it could be changed from GT-OD to ZW-OD but again, that is just a part value change in one or more spots. Still the came circuit.