I think you just mis-understood the point. I understand what you are saying. To understand what I am saying: we aren't talking about 'preference' we are talking about
inherent quality. Certainly 'a' guitar can be great for you, fit your needs, style etc and it can support your vision as a musician or artist and it can sound perfect for an album, a lifetime of albums, an influential guitar tone for others etc. That is never in question. It still doesn't change the inherent quality and the '100 details' that does not go into a $300 finished product vs. a high-end instrument. Its not a debate, it just the reality of production instruments and company mindset. That additional attention to detail costs more, it takes longer to produce and requires specialized knowledge beyond machinery. Seymour Duncan is one of those companies. Just have a visit. Sit down with Kevin, Seymour or Kathy and have a chat. Its passion. Read the companies mission statement. Talk to the workers. That's mission is not fluff, that's a day to day standard of excellence from the products to how every person exec or worker is treated equally.
If anybody believes that a $300 guitar adheres to the same quality control as a $2000 guitar, as general rule then, indeed a lack of experience or knowledge about production (genuine incomprehension) is present. If someone boldy claims that their $300 import has had the same level of detail and expertise put into the finished product as a Collings, MM, Suhr, PRS etc.. it is just silly posturing. There is no foundation for it. Its important to recognize the difference to keep our dialogue clear. I have personally had the real-life pleasure of working with/for, beta testing for, co-designing with and spending time with great gear companies. Factory's visits and tours are always free. I think it is valuable to see first hand for yourself some of the differences any time you have the chance. These videos are cool, but meeting a crew one on one is awesome. Cheers and respect JTK,
RG