I feel like I should know the answer to this given the number of guitars I've had experience with, but...I don't feel that my understanding is clear.
I some guitars that have nut slots that are deep enough for the strings (esp. the high E and B) to be sitting well below the top surface of the nut and others where the string is just at the top or even slightly above the surface (in the case of the higher strings they are in the slot but close to the top). I have a few questions...
1-What is actually the optimal depth...does it vary depending...?
2-If the slot should be shallower, is it as simple as sanding down the top surface to reduce the depth?
3-If a guitar plays well...will doing #2 make an appreciable difference (if it's even possible to generalize)?
I've read the Erlewine book and I interpreted it to say that the slots should be pretty shallow. I have some pretty nice, well set-up guitars that don't seem to follow that suggestion. If I can get them to play even better by taking care of this myself...I'd like to.
So...what's your take?
Thanks for all input in advance!
I some guitars that have nut slots that are deep enough for the strings (esp. the high E and B) to be sitting well below the top surface of the nut and others where the string is just at the top or even slightly above the surface (in the case of the higher strings they are in the slot but close to the top). I have a few questions...
1-What is actually the optimal depth...does it vary depending...?
2-If the slot should be shallower, is it as simple as sanding down the top surface to reduce the depth?
3-If a guitar plays well...will doing #2 make an appreciable difference (if it's even possible to generalize)?
I've read the Erlewine book and I interpreted it to say that the slots should be pretty shallow. I have some pretty nice, well set-up guitars that don't seem to follow that suggestion. If I can get them to play even better by taking care of this myself...I'd like to.
So...what's your take?
Thanks for all input in advance!