Re: Oak as a tone wood.
Well...lol...I can say without a doubt I would choose the pallet guitar over the Gibson. I love their LPs and ES and SG models, their electrics...but the acoustics Gibson makes are a waste of wood, IMO. I am definitely a Martin guy, and I have NEVER, in 45+ years of guitaring played a Gibson that made me go "Wow!" Not J200s, Doves, Hbirds, SJs, 45s...nada. Not a one that I would spend my money on. My old Harmony sounded better than the Gibson acoustics some of my friends had back in college. The Songwriter is a nice guitar, but I'd much rather have D-28. Not trying to start a flame war...I just don't like Gibson acoustics.
And actually, the Pallet Guitar shouldn't be that surprising. Taylor has often used what once were considered "odd" tonewoods, with the theory that if you use a great piece for the top and brace it correctly, you can build a pretty good guitar. Taylor builds very consistently, and whether you choose a mahogany, rosewood, ovangkol, walnut, koa, etc., you're going to get a decent guitar.
I do own a Taylor 710ce, along with nine Martin dreads and a couple of Takamine 12-string dreads. No Gibson acoustics.
And the Pallet Guitars almost NEVER come up for sale: for whatever reason, the owners hang on to them.
I think that the reason we don't see more oak guitars it that, from my understanding, it is hard to work with from a manufacturing POV.
Bill