T
The Shas
Guest
Re: Pearly Gates in bridge...sounds kinda...thin
thanks everyone for the replies
after looking around at more pickups, i'm kinda stuck between either the PG+ or the 59 4con. for the bridge. (i plan on doing jimmy page wiring later on, with all 4 push/pull pots
)
for the PG+, i read that the spacing was made to fit strats. how would that fit in a les paul? i assume the spacing wouldn't be so different that the humbucker wouldn't "work" anymore but what would be the result of putting a strat-spaced PG+ in a les paul?
both have alnico 5 magnets.
i'm perfectly fine with the 59b, but i always thought it was a bad idea to have the same pickup in neck and bridge. i know there's nothing actually wrong with doing that (it's hard to explain. i'm just weird), but I figure that they'd sound...too similar..or something...yea
which of the two (or other pickups) would best offer the beano lead tone?
thanks again to everyone for putting up with me
thanks everyone for the replies
after looking around at more pickups, i'm kinda stuck between either the PG+ or the 59 4con. for the bridge. (i plan on doing jimmy page wiring later on, with all 4 push/pull pots
for the PG+, i read that the spacing was made to fit strats. how would that fit in a les paul? i assume the spacing wouldn't be so different that the humbucker wouldn't "work" anymore but what would be the result of putting a strat-spaced PG+ in a les paul?
both have alnico 5 magnets.
i'm perfectly fine with the 59b, but i always thought it was a bad idea to have the same pickup in neck and bridge. i know there's nothing actually wrong with doing that (it's hard to explain. i'm just weird), but I figure that they'd sound...too similar..or something...yea
which of the two (or other pickups) would best offer the beano lead tone?
thanks again to everyone for putting up with me