Peavey JSX Review

Chris6542

New member
As a gear junkie, I'm always buying amps to try out, then resell most items. The Ecstacy stayed, the SLO stayed, the Carvin Legacy stayed, and even a 69 Superbass stayed which I probably should not have bought ($$$$). An amp Ive always been curious about was the Peavey JSX, and saw a mint head on Reverb for $550 that I couldn't pass up. This is a big, well built, heavy, stout amp, and for $600ish used typically, the best kept secret. This is a great amp with EL34s that does everything very well.

First, the clean is very clean and tight, real similar to an SLO. The clean on my Legacy is warmer and more bell like, but not as pristine or tight. As a pedal platform, the clean channel is great for that, a really nice sounding, tight, "down the middle" pristine clean. Being clean and tight means it's not going to be as warm as a Legacy clean, but it's real tight, which is great for pedals. It's very similar to an SLO clean (which kinda gets the same "not real warm" comments). Very happy with the clean overall.

Second channel crunch is great, and "right down the middle". It will do subtle breakup fine, on up to a pretty heavy saturation, while still retaining clarity. Play Metallica just fine on this crunch channel. This crunch channel feels a bit more open than the ultra lead channel to me and has less compression. It just feels real open and blooms nicely as you play. Both channels have resonance and fat switches to dial in as much fatness and chunk as you could ever want as well.

Ultra lead channel is nicely saturated with a hint of the gravelyness of a 5150/6505 in my opinion. Having a 5150 as well, in my opinion it's generally in the ballpark of a 5150. Similarly, both amps have big bottom end, real chunky and percussive if you like that aspect. The JSX is no less gain than a 5150 (a ton), but somehow feels more civilized with these EL34s, not as gravely and course as a 5150/6505. I was worried this channel would be heavily compressed like many Peaveys, and while it is a little compressed, it's fine, and still tasteful. It's a very high gain amp with great dynamics, great tone, nice clarity and articulation, yet also has a civility and uniqueness to it I really like. I can say nothing sounds like a JSX, but it's generally in the 5150 camp to me. You love a 5150 for the savagery of it, you love the JSX for a mix of savagery and civility. I had a Soldano Decatone once and while the Deca crunch is amazing, the lead channel was way too compressed, fortunately the JSX managed to largely avoid this.

In short, it's a big, beautiful, heavy, well built amp that packs boutique tones for sure. It's a monster of amp that packs surprising versatility, and for the $600ish they go for used, it's a laughably good deal. I put it through my Legacy 4x12 with Greenbacks and it sounds great. You will feel like you stole a JSX, it's so much amp for the money. If this amp said Bogner Uberschall on the front, with the same tones, it would go for $2500. I think Joe was very smart basically playing these tones "right down the middle", which means it will appeal to most players. Super cool amp for very little money!!
 

Attachments

  • photo107332.jpg
    photo107332.jpg
    128.7 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Great review, well done!

The JSX is my ultimate amplifier.

I used Classic 50s mid-90's to mid-2000's. Plenty of gain in the Lead channel for the 80's Metal I was playing, hitting it with my Duncan Custom or Distortion. This was the starting point for the JSX Crunch channel, so check 1.

Mid-2000's I found my Triple XXX, but surprisingly it was for the Clean channel. My ears are likely shot but it is the best Cleans I have found. The Triple XXX is the platform James and Joe started with for the JSX. Check 2.

When I needed more gain, I found more than enough in my Triple XXX Ultra channel. Again, starting platform. Check 3.

It took me until mid 10's to get my JSX. I was concerned I might lose my Triple XXX cleans. I had a friend riding me that entire time, saying I needed to switch to a JSX. Total irrational fear about the cleans, on my part. I truly regret not doing it sooner.

Good to see someone else appreciating the JSX for the versatile amplifier it is.
 
Last edited:
On the chrome....I dig it. I like when designers, of anything, go for it. Music is supposed to be fun. It's sad to think Peavey could have had Eddie, Joe, and George Lynch that early 2000s timeframe. What could have been.....
 
... It's sad to think Peavey could have had Eddie, Joe, and George Lynch that early 2000s timeframe. What could have been.....

The challenge with artists like those 3 is their constant tone quest. They are always pushing to find something better to them. I am curious if someone like Joe wakes up, plugs in his guitar, plays a while, and thinks "I had that tone yesterday. It is great, but how can I get more ________?" I think this is one of the reasons that artists move on.

All 3 of their amps (5150, JSX, Triple XXX) evolved from the Ultra Series. In my experience the 5150 does not have the cleans. The Triple XXX has no true disparity between the Crunch and Ultra channels, one have to dial the Crunch channel down and the Ultra channel up. But James and Joe nailed it with the JSX. A great clean; 60's, 70's, and 80's on the Crunch channel; 90's and beyond on the Ultra channel. I also think Peavey realized this as reflected by the Invective evolving from the 5150/6505, but adding a Clean channel like the JSX.
 
Great review, well done!

The JSX is my ultimate amplifier.

I used Classic 50s mid-90's to mid-2000's. Plenty of gain in the Lead channel for the 80's Metal I was playing, hitting it with my Duncan Custom or Distortion. This was the starting point for the JSX Crunch channel, so check 1.

Mid-2000's I found my Triple XXX, but surprisingly it was for the Clean channel. My ears are likely shot but it is the best Cleans I have found. The Triple XXX is the platform James and Joe started with for the JSX. Check 2.

When I needed more gain, I found more than enough in my Triple XXX Ultra channel. Again, starting platform. Check 3.

It took me until mid 10's to get my JSX. I was concerned I might lose my Triple XXX cleans. I had a friend riding me that entire time, saying I needed to switch to a JSX. Total irrational fear about the cleans, on my part. I truly regret not doing it sooner.

Good to see someone else appreciating the JSX for the versatile amplifier it is.

What are these "cleans" about which you speak?
 

Peavey always had potential but seem to burn every bridge that ever made them legit.
Hartly is retired in his 80's, what have they done for me lately ?
 
Yeah, not much in the tube guitar amplifier market since the invective.

They truly have been challenged on all fronts, innovation included, since the pandemic started. It must have hit Mississippi harder than a lot of places.
 
Yeah, not much in the tube guitar amplifier market since the invective.

They truly have been challenged on all fronts, innovation included, since the pandemic started. It must have hit Mississippi harder than a lot of places.

All Meridian MS factory operations were shut down years ago.
Everything is made in Jina.
 
The Invective might sound great I don't know, but the cosmetics make me look away fast.

Interesting. It think of them as modiernized 6505 cosmetics. Is it the white knobs? Regardless, I think the cosmetics are not as odd as my Penta's.
 
Interesting. It think of them as modiernized 6505 cosmetics. Is it the white knobs? Regardless, I think the cosmetics are not as odd as my Penta's.

Yeah I'm just weird when it comes to cosmetics/art. I love some real ugly stuff and then hate stuff that most people like. Probably got dropped on my head as an infant!
Penta,,,hate.
6505,,,,I like those but not the 5150 or the new 6505-2 with big stupid numbers across the front.
Old silverstripe 90s era with the pointy jetsons style logo,,,,,,,love them.
 
What was the involvement of Ben Fargen on the JSX? I think some allege he was a key designer of Joe's JSX.

That is interesting. I have always read it was James Brown. I know Fargen mods amps and builds boutique amps, but have not run across his involvement before. Perhaps Fargen modified one/some of Joe's JSXs?

The JSX truly was not so much designed, as it was modified. I thought I had a .pdf from somewhere with James describing this, but I am not able to find it at the moment.

Joe and James started with the Triple XXX. Joe liked the Triple XXX Clean and Ultra channels, but he did not care for the Crunch channel. (Side note that I own both the Triple XXX head and 112 Combo, and there truly is not much difference between the Crunch and Ultra channels.) Joe did like the Lead channel on the Peavey Classic 50, so the goal was to make the Triple XXX Crunch channel sound like the C50 Lead channel.

So ultiimately the JSX is a Triple XXX with some tweaks to the Clean and Ultra channels, and the Crunch channel replaced with the Classic 50 Lead channel. I have all 3 schematics, so in a spare moment I will do some compare/contrast to see how close they are.

If I can get the pic to post, here is a little Prototype Proof courtesy of Chris Goodwin at Peavey.

joe_xxx_proto.jpg - Joe with JSX Triple XXX Prototypes
 
Back
Top