www.belmanguitars.com
check out these guitars from melbourne, awesome instruments!
the bass player in my band just got the Hornet model and it's really mid-heavy
it's got a chambered queensland maple body, set neck 22 frets, ebony fretboard
queensland maple is an australian tonewood which does resembles mahogany in tone and grain, except it registers more in the upper mids with its bottom end coming from lower mids
anyway so my bass player wants more bottom end out of this guitar, especially for the bridge pickup,, i was initially thinking of either a custom or custom5
Neck pickup wise, i was leaning towards a 59' or a Jazz bridge. I want chords to be articulate, and ive read that the 59 can get boomy. but for a guitar with less bottom end and more upper mids than a mahogany guitar, would this boominess be a problem?
would the Jazz have too many highs and mids for a guitar thats already prominent in this frequency range?
check out these guitars from melbourne, awesome instruments!
the bass player in my band just got the Hornet model and it's really mid-heavy
it's got a chambered queensland maple body, set neck 22 frets, ebony fretboard
queensland maple is an australian tonewood which does resembles mahogany in tone and grain, except it registers more in the upper mids with its bottom end coming from lower mids
anyway so my bass player wants more bottom end out of this guitar, especially for the bridge pickup,, i was initially thinking of either a custom or custom5
Neck pickup wise, i was leaning towards a 59' or a Jazz bridge. I want chords to be articulate, and ive read that the 59 can get boomy. but for a guitar with less bottom end and more upper mids than a mahogany guitar, would this boominess be a problem?
would the Jazz have too many highs and mids for a guitar thats already prominent in this frequency range?