Re: Probably should be a poll.
I don't know, but am interested in this subject as I've been thinking about gettin a spider II 2-10, off hand I just like the features, and the FX layout reminds me of my old korg g-3 (yeah, cool good sounding little toy)I loved the simplicity of it, but wished the delay time was adjustable, when I saw the tap function of the spider II, plus the distortion boost, and tuner ... i thought that would be a cool little amp to have as a all purpose work horse ( no grief if it gets broken or such). From my limited (very) exposure to line 6 stuff, they do have some really noce tones in them ... tubey? Hit and miss, on that ... come on it's a modelling amp ...

I would be more concerned about how dynamic they are, how dependable also ... like a guy told me, if anything breaks, it's basically a computer, send it back to the factory ... I would get the FBV Shortboard with it though, speaking of that ... that don't say a whole lot about the wah function that's available from the pedal board ... How does the wah sound? Also, I noticed one the spider there is flanger, chorus, and then tremolo, on the spider II it's flanger/chorus ... are they still two different effects or are they kinda lumped into a conglomerate (I hate it when a chorus/flanger sounds just like that ...the chorus always has that flangey tone to it, and the flanger is always a little to chourusey), also how is the tremolo, and how is the phaser on the spider II ... Also the spider II has something called sweep delay, what's that? Is that the same as the ping pong delay on the spider?
How's the reverb, length, depth, tone? Anyone use the noise gate, if so how is that? I love a total indepth review of the two amps (the 2-10 versions only),the owner;s manual don't tell you much about the FX at all. Iif they are as good as the korg g-3's then they are good (not great, but good).
Sorry, about jumping the post, but I love to know the details ...