StalePretzel
New member
Re: PRS Vs LTD
Which is why i told him the wood wouldn't really play a factor...
Which is why i told him the wood wouldn't really play a factor...
Which is why i told him the wood wouldn't really play a factor...
but we're trying to steer him away from crappy digital line 6 sounding marshalls, not towards tone hell! :banghead:
the V looks nice.... aaa... but EVERYTHING so cheap.... i mean ... im shocked!... thanks for the suggestion.. thats a nice low priced axe..
you know bro alot of the time... you get what you pay for. not always, but most of the time... just keep that in mind.
or, you could save up some more money. i have loads of guitars, and i think theyre all crappy. i should have kept my crappy axe and saved up for something Bad A$$.
valid point.
but tell me the PRS isnt the better guitar if he replaces the pickups?
I have tons of cheap guitars.. after figuring out what sucks about them, you replace what needs to be replaced (pickups, bridge, tuners, pots, nut, whatever), and make it yours. No need to pay $2000 for a guitar when an upgraded cheap one will work just as well.
Marshall MG? Mangled Gonads? Avoid at all costs!
Little boxes. Little boxes.
And they're all made of ticky tacky
And they all SOUND just the same.
Received wisdom (probably from Aspen Pittman) has it that, if you want to know what your electric guitar really sounds like, plug it into a blackface Fender.
If you wanna rumble, move on to a Tweed Bassman or its British half brother, the Marshall JTM45.
If you wanna play dirty, get a Marshall Plexi or an old Orange.
If you wanna go stratospheric, get some ultra-high gain, master volume beast.
If you expect to get all of these tones from a single product, write a big cheque for something with Groove Tubes or Boogie written on the front.
What do all of these amplifiers have in common? Thermo-ionic valve (tube) circuitry and loudspeaker enclosures assembled from actual wood rather than compressed wood fibre pulp.
Obviously, beginners have got to start somewhere but, in my opinion, all that a Marshall MG amplifier is going to instill in anyone is the notion that a nasty zizzy sound can pass for music. These guys might as well listen to an abrasive wheel being used in a metalwork shop.
In coclusion, I cannot help thinking that Marshall is doing itself a disservice by manufacturing "budget/beginner" amps under its own name.
Marshall is achieving tonal genocide. I hate my MG50DFX
may b u hate it coz its a low end amp... i think every brand has low end amps...
No, we hate it because it sucks. This coming from someone who owns and likes a Behringer V-Tone as a practice amp.