Remind me of the significance of having, or not having, a wound G-string.

Artie

Peaveyologist
Remember, we're talking guitars here. ;)

I should know the answer to this, but it escapes me at the moment. I know I could "google" it, but I like tapping into this pool of info better.

Thanks;
Artie
 
Re: Remind me of the significance of having, or not having, a wound G-string.

IMO...

Wound G intonates better, especially as you go bigger, plain G allows you to bend easier and further, especially as you go bigger. (Once you have a large gauge plain G, simply fretting the string too hard can cause a note to go sharp)

Again, IMO, a lot of what we think of as the "rock sound" is that plain G, and the Chuck Berry style full step bends followed by notes on the B and E. For playing cowboy chord style accompaniment and pure rhythm guitar, the wound G is an interesting alternative to the plain.
 
Re: Remind me of the significance of having, or not having, a wound G-string.

Hmmm . . . this might be counter-productive to what I was seeking. The crux of my playing is thumb-nail picked leads to slow-ish blues backing tracks. I just picked up a couple packs of D'Addario strings to try something new. XL Chromes (Jazz lights), flat-wound in 11's with .022w G, and XL nickel wound 10's with a 18w G. This could be interesting.

P.S. Would I be better off trying these on a shorter Gibson scale, or longer Fender scale axe?
 
Last edited:
Re: Remind me of the significance of having, or not having, a wound G-string.

Wasn't the wound G standard on electrics early on? I think the vintage stagger of strat pickups was designed around the wound G. Blues and rock players began expanding styles with a lot of bending and that wound G was a ***** to bend. So they went to a plain G. But the plain G is much louder and brighter, so the stagger of strat pickups changed to accommodate. Feel free to correct my history cause I'm just going from memory and I may have never had it right.

At any rate, I've tried a wound G on and off. It is a ***** to bend. If memory serves, they wear out a lot quicker too if you do a lot of bending (but I was using as light a wound 3rd as I could get). Takes a while to get used to the tone and it may be too soft anyway, depending on pickups/stagger. But I think they sound better ... the plain G sounds "off" to me often, even when in tune and intonated. And I don't have golden ears. But it's just too much effort for me to bend the wound G, especially nowadays.

Find them as singles and pick up a few, try them yourself and see what you think.
 
Re: Remind me of the significance of having, or not having, a wound G-string.

Wasn't the wound G standard on electrics early on? I think the vintage stagger of strat pickups was designed around the wound G. Blues and rock players began expanding styles with a lot of bending and that wound G was a ***** to bend. So they went to a plain G. But the plain G is much louder and brighter, so the stagger of strat pickups changed to accommodate. Feel free to correct my history cause I'm just going from memory and I may have never had it right.

I think you got that dead on.
 
Re: Remind me of the significance of having, or not having, a wound G-string.

A wound G intonates better and it doesn't ring out too loud when playing chords.
 
Re: Remind me of the significance of having, or not having, a wound G-string.

Someone else mentioned that. Why would it intonate better? Not doubting you. Just wondering.
 
Re: Remind me of the significance of having, or not having, a wound G-string.

Dean Markley's thicker sets ship with both a wound and an unwound G string. Good for trying them out.
 
Re: Remind me of the significance of having, or not having, a wound G-string.

Someone else mentioned that. Why would it intonate better? Not doubting you. Just wondering.
Probably because it has higher tension and is heavier gauge.
 
Re: Remind me of the significance of having, or not having, a wound G-string.

Someone else mentioned that. Why would it intonate better? Not doubting you. Just wondering.

The plain G strings are too stiff and that raises the frequency of the first overtone quite a bit. Think about the "knick" at the nut and saddle. It isn't. It is rounded so the effective "swing" length of the string is a bit less. Only the lower overtones care. The higher overtones just have less individual swings.
 
Re: Remind me of the significance of having, or not having, a wound G-string.

I'm trying to follow you, but I'm not. The lower, (frequency wise), strings intonate just fine. Why wouldn't the "G" behave in that same manner?
 
Re: Remind me of the significance of having, or not having, a wound G-string.

The wound G sounded and stayed in tune better overall but my fingers broke off when I tried to bend / vibrate. If I played rhythm only I'd go for it without hesitation.
 
Re: Remind me of the significance of having, or not having, a wound G-string.

P.S. Would I be better off trying these on a shorter Gibson scale, or longer Fender scale axe?

As stated already, bends will be quite a bit more difficult on the wound G. Ever try playing blues licks on an acoustic? Like that. So unless you're not bending much, it'd be easier on the 24¾" scale.
 
Re: Remind me of the significance of having, or not having, a wound G-string.

Blues is about bending strings, I can't see using a wound G string unless you're just playing chords. Plain strings are louder than wound strings; thick strings are louder than thin ones. Going from a plain G to a wound G means the loudest string will become the lowest volume one. Too many tradeoffs for me.
 
Re: Remind me of the significance of having, or not having, a wound G-string.

I'm trying to follow you, but I'm not. The lower, (frequency wise), strings intonate just fine. Why wouldn't the "G" behave in that same manner?

The wound strings bend much easier with their thinner core.
 
Re: Remind me of the significance of having, or not having, a wound G-string.

Remember, we're talking guitars here. ;)

I should know the answer to this, but it escapes me at the moment. I know I could "google" it, but I like tapping into this pool of info better.

Thanks;
Artie

The significance of having a plain G means you were born after James Burton.
 
Re: Remind me of the significance of having, or not having, a wound G-string.

Well dang! Deep blues bends is what I'm all about. I suppose I can toss these on one axe and call it my "chord" machine. Thing is, I bought a 3-pak of the EXL110W's. Then again, it's fun to experiment with new things. :cool2:
 
Re: Remind me of the significance of having, or not having, a wound G-string.

It's not hard to bend a wound G unless you plan on bending past a step and a half. It only takes a few sessions of playing to get used to it.
 
Re: Remind me of the significance of having, or not having, a wound G-string.

How hard a string is to bend depends only on it's tension and flexibility, not wound vs unwound, and besides hardly anyone ever subs a wound of the same gauge as their plain G.
Try replacing a plain 17 with a 17w tuned the same and then see if the wound is harder to bend.
 
Back
Top