Re: Rockman Tone in 2017
Ho. Lee. ****. Guys.
Over the course of the past couple of days, between remote work sessions, I have read the entirety of this thread, all 500+ posts and almost three years of it. It's been a revelation; I feel like the protagonist on one of those Neil Gaiman novels who discovers there's some supernatural reality hidden beneath what most people
think is reality.
Back in high school (the early '90s), I was best friends with this dude named Adrian; he and I spent a great deal of time playing and recording music together. (We had an ancient--even for then--Tascam 388 1/4-inch 8-track in his basement, although eventually we graduated to some early versions of Cakewalk.) He played mostly keyboards, and I played the guitar. He worked at Kenelley Keys for a while, where he bought this thing, for something like $25, out of their junk box:
We were both willing to drop $25 on pretty much anything that seemed weird or possibly useful. There was something easily-fixable wrong with it--I think it's power cable was shorn off--so he put a new one in and gave it to me. We were amused by the fact that it said "ROCKMAN" on it, and horrified by how it sounded.
I've hauled it around for more than 25 years now; I've spent plenty of time pushing the buttons and watching the lights cycle and blink, and I've even used it on a few recordings, but I've never really managed to get a sound out of it that I
liked. I had
absolutely no idea of this thing's legacy or provenance until I started reading this thread. I never would have dreamed it was anything other than an early, pre-digital member of a long line of guitar multi-effects processors that (in my opinion, which was heavily influenced by my formative musical time: the early '90s; more on that later) would all be hideously terrible until Line 6 had tried their hand at it a couple of times.
In defense of my ignorance, I never liked Boston (or much from the late '70s / early '80s), and so never would have looked into Tom Scholz or his equipment or anything. And guitar music, particularly where I was coming of age (yep, Seattle), was definitely eschewing the processed, controlled tone you get out of a rack unit and reference-grade power section in favor of running a ****ty ol' pawnshop Jaguar or SG into tubes, tubes, tubes. Guitar mags at the time certainly wouldn't have talked about it, and we didn't have the Internet yet. (It existed, we just didn't really
have it.)
Almost everybody likes the music of his or her own generation, and I think most people like the music of their parents' generation (they get indoctrinated before they really have a chance to form their own opinions). But there's that music that's a half-generation in between the two that you just can't get into; it's what your generation was rejecting (while they were rediscovering what your parents liked). So, in defense of my distaste for Boston, they fall exactly in that sour spot for me. (So do Def Leppard and so many of those '80s bands who would have layed tracks with Rockman stuff.) The production, the guitar sounds, even Brad Delp's voice, doofy face, and white-dude perm-fro hair (to my shallow, 15-year-old self he was like the anti-Chris Cornell) just turned me off.
But I'm happy to have this small mystery that I've carried around more than half my life solved for me. Thanks, guys. I don't think I'll ever like Boston or love the sounds I get out of my Rockman XPR, but this thread has at least given me a newfound respect for Tom Scholz, and revealed what seems to be practially an entire
subculture centered around what I had always assumed was a piece of clunky, obscure gear. I've also just enjoyed seeing so many of you guys so enthused about this stuff.
So this thread gets a huge spiritual plus one from me.
And again: Thanks.