SG wraparound conversion

SGFanatic

SGFanatic

New member
This is what I want to do. I have a 2009 Gibson SG Standard and I want to remove the stock APR-1 style bridge and replace it with a Tone Pros style or Bad Ass style wraparound bridge. I realize I'll have to drill and do all that stuff. I've been thinking about for a while now and wanted to post my thoughts before I get crazy. My question concerns the position of the new bridge. The ABR is angled so the low E string is futher away from the nut. Now all the photos I see of the 70's style SG's the bridge is perfectly parallel, with no rise/run away from the nut. That's what it looks like anyway. If I do replace the bridge, do I have to angle the bridge as such, or can I fit the new post straight in line with nut? I know this is going to de-value the guitar, so from a economical perspective, its a no, but I don't care about that. What I do care about is renduring the guitar unplayable and having to have some major luthier work done to bring it back to normal. I'm also open to people arguing me out of it, albeit within sound reasoning. With all that said, my question is, will I be able to install this bridge (whether I do the work or not) and keep the guitar within the acceptable tolerances for proper intonation and tuning stability?
 
Re: SG wraparound conversion

I am 99% certain that somebody makes a combined bridge/tailpiece that does precisely what you want without the need to remove or re-drill the Tune-O-Matic mounts.

The stud or screw inserts should be drilled perpendicular to the line taken by the strings. Thus, on a set neck guitar with a neck pitch, the inserts will enter the body at an angle.

In my opinion, the TOM/Stopbar bridge assembly is part of the SG Standard sound. If you wanted the wrapover bridge, it would have been wiser to have purchased an SG that had this bridge to begin with then changed its P-90 pickguard assembly to something for twin humbuckers.
 
Last edited:
Re: SG wraparound conversion

You are literally the only person I've ever heard of who wanted to go from TOM + STP to wrap-around. Usually people are trying to do the opposite.
 
Re: SG wraparound conversion

Funkfingers said:
I am 99% certain that somebody makes a combined bridge/tailpiece that does precisely what you want without the need to remove or re-drill the Tune-O-Matic mounts.

The stud or screw inserts should be drilled perpendicular to the line taken by the strings. Thus, on a set neck guitar with a neck pitch, the inserts will enter the body at an angle.

In my opinion, the TOM/Stopbar bridge assembly is part of the SG Standard sound. If you wanted the wrapover bridge, it would have been wiser to have purchased an SG that had this bridge to begin with then changed its P-90 pickguard assembly to something for twin humbuckers.
Click to expand...

What I want is to replace the bridge with a wraparound bridge and the wraparound bridge's post to post measurement is wider than the ABR bridge.
 
Re: SG wraparound conversion

Gibson used to angle wraparounds and as the years went on they angle went away.

Either way will be fine since you can tweak it with the adjustment on a wraparound
 
Re: SG wraparound conversion

the guy who invented fire said:
Gibson used to angle wraparounds and as the years went on they angle went away.

Either way will be fine since you can tweak it with the adjustment on a wraparound
Click to expand...
that's what I thought because those bridges have a lot to play in the saddles as far as how much you can move the string back and forth for intonation.
 
Re: SG wraparound conversion

SGFanatic said:
that's what I thought because those bridges have a lot to play in the saddles as far as how much you can move the string back and forth for intonation.
Click to expand...

Well, just a bar bridge can be intonated back and forth on the studs so no matter if you go angled or straight with the right wraparound bridge you should be able to intonate.
 
Re: SG wraparound conversion

SGFanatic said:
Exactly. Shaller makes an adjustable wraparound. I saw one at stew-mac that looks good.
Click to expand...

I use an old Leo Quann on my Melody Maker and my brother uses one on his old SG...however he uses the Schaller 455 on his LP Jr and likes it better than the Bad Ass.

I think it's a quality bridge for sure and it's a LOT easier to get than a Quan.
 
Re: SG wraparound conversion

Wraparound bridges usually have screws to adjust the bridge-to-post distance. Even if you set it with perfectly straight posts, you can crank the screw of the low strings post to match the position of a stock tune-o-matic bridge. However, that's commonly used for wraparound bridges with fixed intonation. If you get a wraparound with intonable saddles you'll likely won't have to mess with that.

I would consider going from a wraparound to a TOM/Stopbar combo but never the other way. The unused stopbar posts would look really bad.
 
Re: SG wraparound conversion

PonyKiller said:
Wraparound bridges usually have screws to adjust the bridge-to-post distance. Even if you set it with perfectly straight posts, you can crank the screw of the low strings post to match the position of a stock tune-o-matic bridge. However, that's commonly used for wraparound bridges with fixed intonation. If you get a wraparound with intonable saddles you'll likely won't have to mess with that.

I would consider going from a wraparound to a TOM/Stopbar combo but never the other way. The unused stopbar posts would look really bad.
Click to expand...

Yes, I understand that. It's not too much of a concern for me. I'm OK with that as long as I'm happy with the rest of it. I'm still not 100% if I'm going through with it.
 
Re: SG wraparound conversion

Well, if we are talking about a wraparound bridge with intonable saddles, it all comes down to aesthetics as it'll perform exactly as the TOM/Stopbar setup. It comes down to personal preference.

As for the wraparound bridge replacing the TOM, according to the Stewmac site, it'll be OK:
Tune-o-matic style bridges:
ABR-1 Tune-o-matic Bridges
Nashville Tune-o-matic Bridge
Gotoh Tune-o-matic Bridge
Schaller Roller Bridge
L.R. Baggs T-Bridge
Locking Roller Bridge
Gotoh 510 Bridge & Tailpiece
24.623" (±0.030") from nut to center of treble-side post. Mount bass-side post 1/16"-1/8" further from the nut.

Combo Bridge/Tailpieces:
Schaller Bridge/Tailpiece
SG Junior Bridge
Adjustable Wraparound Bridge
Pigtail Aluminum Wraparound Bridge
Wilkinson/Gotoh Adjustable Bridge/Tailpiece
Hipshot Baby Grand Bridge
24.623" (±0.030") from nut to center of mounting studs.
Note: Some bridge/tailpieces may require you to mount the bass-side stud an additional 1/16"-1/8" further from the nut.
Click to expand...

Now, keep in mind that the current TOM post location wouldn't gonna work for the new bridge. Wraparound bridges usually require the same post location as the stopbar, which is wider than the TOM setup.

Check out the Warmoth site with the dimensions:
Scroll down to "Gibson® Type Bridge Mounting"
http://www.warmoth.com/Guitar/Bodies/Options/BridgeRoutingOptions.aspx

The posts should be 8mm further appart (according to Warmoth at least). Anyway, the recent SG Standards have the full pickguard around the TOM so you'll also have to modify it. No big deal on the 'guard but you'll likely gonna have problems with the body. The current holes would likely have to be doweled before you drill the new holes. Good thing is that the guard will cover everything (well, except the stopbar posts...).
So far seems like its doable (in theory at least).

Dunno man, seems like an awful lot of trouble to get to the same place at the end (at a functional point of view).

At the end, I don't see it negatively affecting the value of the guitar. The pickguard would cover everything either way. If you ever want to go back, just redowel/redill the holes for the TOM, get a new 'guard and everything would look stock.
 
Re: SG wraparound conversion

The bridge is likely a Nashville TOM, not an ABR-1. If it is an ABR-1, you probably have a '61 Reissue, not a Standard, and I would not touch it. Personally, I'd get a Junior or Special and convert to humbuckers before I would take a Standard and convert it to a wraparound...but whatever floats your boat. It's not like it's a precious antique or something. I just don't know what you are hoping to achieve.

You'll have to plug the stock holes and drill new ones, unless you can find someone out there who makes a drop-in conversion (not likely). You can use whatever angle your bridge already has, or if you get a tunable wraparound, you can even put it in straight. I'd just use the angle that is already there. I've seen '60's ones that were angled, and others that were straight, so either way you do it won't be glaringly inconsistent with what might have been. (But those empty stop tailpiece inserts will be.) And the post holes in your pickguard are angled, so those will be covered up better if you keep the same angle.

The '70's and early '80's Gibson bridges could be non-angled because the bridges they used were so wide. Even then, some of them (like the one on my '83 LP Custom) had multiple post holes on the bottoms, so you could angle the bridge if needed.

PonyKiller said:
The unused stopbar posts would look really bad.
Click to expand...

Doesn't make much sense without an added vibrato, but what they hay?

custom_made_plate.jpg


http://www.ebay.com/itm/CUSTOM-MADE...683?pt=Guitar_Accessories&hash=item564acebebb
 
Last edited:
Re: SG wraparound conversion

ItsaBass said:
The bridge is likely a Nashville TOM, not an ABR-1. If it is an ABR-1, you probably have a '61 Reissue, not a Standard, and I would not touch it. Personally, I'd get a Junior or Special and convert to humbuckers before I would take a Standard and convert it to a wraparound...but whatever floats your boat. It's not like it's a precious antique or something. I just don't know what you are hoping to achieve.

You'll have to plug the stock holes and drill new ones, unless you can find someone out there who makes a drop-in conversion (not likely). You can use whatever angle your bridge already has, or if you get a tunable wraparound, you can even put it in straight. I'd just use the angle that is already there. I've seen '60's ones that were angled, and others that were straight, so either way you do it won't be glaringly inconsistent with what might have been. (But those empty stop tailpiece inserts will be.) And the post holes in your pickguard are angled, so those will be covered up better if you keep the same angle.

The '70's and early '80's Gibson bridges could be non-angled because the bridges they used were so wide. Even then, some of them (like the one on my '83 LP Custom) had multiple post holes on the bottoms, so you could angle the bridge if needed.



Doesn't make much sense without an added vibrato, but what they hay?

custom_made_plate.jpg


http://www.ebay.com/itm/CUSTOM-MADE...683?pt=Guitar_Accessories&hash=item564acebebb
Click to expand...
You're right, its a Nashville on a standard.
I knew I would get flak for posting this. And yes blue, I should be found a lot of other things besides drilling holes into my guitars.
 
Re: SG wraparound conversion

SGFanatic said:
This is what I want to do. I have a 2009 Gibson SG Standard and I want to remove the stock APR-1 style bridge and replace it with a Tone Pros style or Bad Ass style wraparound bridge.
Click to expand...


Why ? Just curious...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

blakejcan
Saddle alignment on a tele
2
Replies
29
Views
410
ehdwuld
ehdwuld
GibSG
My new Gibson SG !
Replies
6
Views
429
Ashurbanipal
Ashurbanipal
T
Luthier who can machine a Floyd Nut?
2
Replies
23
Views
1K
GilmourD
GilmourD
C
HSH Guitars
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
Phantasmagoria
Phantasmagoria
Ascension
It think I have created a MONSTER!
Replies
2
Views
297
Ascension
Ascension
Back
Top