SH-4 JB or SH-5 Custom in Gibson Explorers

Charlie Boo

New member
OK Seymour Guys - please help out a brotha who is strongly considering "taking the leap" back to passives.

It's been almost 10 years since I have played passives. I currently have EMG 81/60 in 3 of my guitars and the EMG JH Set in the other. Before we go on an anti-EMG rant, I really like these pick-ups for what they are designed to do - they have been an integral part of my sound when I needed I higher output pick-up to drive the slightly lower gain amp I used to primarily use (DC-10). However - I have recently fallen in favor with Diamond Amplification - specifically the Heretic (all of their amps are freaking awesome - give them a try if you get a chance!). The Heretic has a lot more gain than the Mesa and runs a lot hotter (EL34's). The EMG's are almost overkill - specifically on the clean channel, which the EMG's break up before the gain even gets to "2". In addition, Diamond's are known for their responsiveness to pick attack and the volume knobs on a guitar. Since EMG's are so compressed, and rolling back the volume knob doesn't "clean up" the tone as well as passives, I'm thinking about jumping back to the world of Duncans so I can have more tonal versatility at my disposal and better cleans.

My 2 primary guitars right now are both Gibson Explorers. Both are solid-bodied mahogany, one with an ebony neck, and the other with rosewood. One guitar (ebony) is tuned a half-step down and the other (rosewood) a full step - both of which are frequently in "drop tuning" on the top string (C# and C). Although I have a large pedalboard, pretty much everything is bypassed 90% of the time, so it's pretty much guitar to amp.

The "Tone Wizard" suggests either the JB or the Custom for the bridge. As I stated earlier, the Heretic is a "dark" sounding amp, so I'd like a pickup with some "presence". I am leaning towards trying the Custom because the ceramic magnet may make an easier tonal transition for me, coming from EMG's. A strong attack and clarity are both very important to me (which is what originally drew me to EMG's). The only thing pulling me towards the JB is the fact that some guitar players whose tone I really like have used the JB (Adam Jones from Tool comes to mind) - but their rigs are totally different, and the Diamond already has very strong mids.

I'd appreciate advice from anyone who has played both of these and has an opinion on their key differences. Sorry for the long-winded thread-start ... I'm new here - haha. THANKS!
 
Re: SH-4 JB or SH-5 Custom in Gibson Explorers

Hello and welcome aboard, Charlie.

I'd pick the Full Shred, Custom and Distortion for what you want.
 
Re: SH-4 JB or SH-5 Custom in Gibson Explorers

if i was going to drop down from EMGs i would go straight for the dimarzio super distortion..raw texture great for power chords and leads

 
Re: SH-4 JB or SH-5 Custom in Gibson Explorers

I have an Explorer, and I've used both the JB and Custom in it (the Custom is there now). In terms of brightness and midrange I found both pickups similar, the the Custom is definitely thicker. This made the JB seem more bright, and maybe a bit nasal. My Explorer has an ebony board, so maybe try the JB in your rosewood Explorer and the Custom in your ebony one. I should add that I also used to have EMGs in my Explorer (81/85), but got rid of them due to the lack of dynamic range you cited.
 
Last edited:
Re: SH-4 JB or SH-5 Custom in Gibson Explorers

The Custom works well with Gibsons. I've used it in Flying V's and Les Pauls. JB would be a little more honky in the mids.
 
Re: SH-4 JB or SH-5 Custom in Gibson Explorers

Because you mentioned the EMGs breaking up on the clean channel, I'm assuming you want a high output (quite a few low-output pickups work extremely well with high gain amps) pickup based on tossing the selection up between the JB and Custom. If you want a high output pickup that cleans up very well that is very responsive, strong attack/clarity, and balanced mids (for the mid-heavy amp, I'd suggest the Black Winter. Users who have experience with the Black Winter can probably attest to this.
 
SH-4 JB or SH-5 Custom in Gibson Explorers

Because you mentioned the EMGs breaking up on the clean channel, I'm assuming you want a high output (quite a few low-output pickups work extremely well with high gain amps) pickup based on tossing the selection up between the JB and Custom. If you want a high output pickup that cleans up very well that is very responsive, strong attack/clarity, and balanced mids (for the mid-heavy amp, I'd suggest the Black Winter. Users who have experience with the Black Winter can probably attest to this.

If the emg's breaks up his amp, I would not suggest the BW. Too much output.
The cleans sound nice, but they would still break up his amp. The BW's need a high headroom amp.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Re: SH-4 JB or SH-5 Custom in Gibson Explorers

Since your amp now very gainy, very hot, dark sounding with a lot of mids, I'd say go with lower output pickups than JB and Custom such as Screamin' Demon. Demon will give you a fine amount of attack, clarity and presence.
 
Re: SH-4 JB or SH-5 Custom in Gibson Explorers

^To elelpe. Or use a setup like mine with a high output pickup in the bridge (where you can get a good attack and the heaviness) with a low output pickup in the neck (where you can get a good thick tone for the cleans).

I'd suggest a DD/59 combo. The Tone Wizard doesn't usually suggest a Distortion, but the only pickup more clearer than the DD is the Screamin Demon. The 59 is a great neck pickup that has a nice thick sound for cleans.
 
Re: SH-4 JB or SH-5 Custom in Gibson Explorers

To directly answer the question: JB

To help YOU answer the question: If you want good bass thump, are concerned about the mids, but want screaming highs, get the Custom. If you want less bass, like the mids, presence, and cut and want piercing highs, the JB might be better.

To perhaps add some alternate considerations…

I concur that you may indeed want to think about a non-high output. 59 = Custom except way less power. That might sound VERY good in there. Perhaps a PG neck/59 bridge

Also, as mentioned, a 59/Distortion is not a bad choice either. Again, the Distortion will have more kids than you want with the amp maybe.
 
Re: SH-4 JB or SH-5 Custom in Gibson Explorers

Thanks for the input, everybody ... I think no matter what I decide, I'm going to have to put the liberator in so I can easily swap out pick-ups because after watching the high gain sample video on the site, I'd like to try out about half a dozen or so - LOL. I have to believe ANY passive is going to have less output than an active EMG or Blackout, so I am open to trying anything. I'm not "unhappy" with my current set up, I just know there is "more" to be had. The Black Winter is definitely intriguing, as well as the Duncan Distortion - and after watching the video, the 59/Custom Hybrid looks promising, as well. My cousin has a Screamin Demon equipped guitar, so maybe I'll give that a try first, use it as a passive "baseline" and go from there.

Regarding the DiMarzio suggestion - I have very little experience with them, so I'd be less inclined to try them - but the D Activators definitely have me intrigued, especially after watching this demo video with John 5 playing all clean. If they sound that good and snappy clean, perhaps they could be an ideal solution.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_RZhpxiyxc
 
Last edited:
Re: SH-4 JB or SH-5 Custom in Gibson Explorers

The only thing pulling me towards the JB is the fact that some guitar players whose tone I really like have used the JB (Adam Jones from Tool comes to mind) - but their rigs are totally different, and the Diamond already has very strong mids.

From what I know (or thought I knew), Adam Jones had his JB modified. He wouldn't get into the specifics on what has been done with it other than he said it was made hotter. My guess would be he stuck a normal sized ceramic in there judging from the sound.
Duncan Distortion would be a good way to start, going from EMG's and for what you're shooting at. Jazz in the neck would make it very versatile.
 
Re: SH-4 JB or SH-5 Custom in Gibson Explorers

I think that you'd love a C5.

B

To each their own. I also tried the C5 briefly and hated it; as it was scooped, boomy, and shrill all at the same time. Maybe it's a rosewood vs ebony thing?
 
Re: SH-4 JB or SH-5 Custom in Gibson Explorers

I have to believe ANY passive is going to have less output than an active EMG or Blackout, so I am open to trying anything.

I dunno, I have never thought that the EMG's are actually THAT high output. Is this true, that any passive will always be lower output than active? Seems more like a design thingy than general rule. The BW seems to me like it's higher output than the EMG JH sets that I have though. Perhaps it's the compression of active that makes it less peaky...

I am genuinely curious.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Re: SH-4 JB or SH-5 Custom in Gibson Explorers

Well, if you move the EMGs a wee bit back from the strings and feed them with 18v, they are no longer as hot nor as compressed.
 
Re: SH-4 JB or SH-5 Custom in Gibson Explorers

I dunno, I have never thought that the EMG's are actually THAT high output. Is this true, that any passive will always be lower output than active? Seems more like a design thingy than general rule. The BW seems to me like it's higher output than the EMG JH sets that I have though. Perhaps it's the compression of active that makes it less peaky...

I am genuinely curious.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This has been bothering me for quite some time ... according to the EMG 81 specs, it has an RMS output of 1.25 V and a peak of 1.75 V. By comparison, the Dimarzio Super Distortion is 425mv (or .425V). I highly doubt the 81 is twice as loud as the Super Distortion, so perhaps "output" does not necessarily equal "volume" or "loudness". Then again, I read somewhere else that EMGs output is "split" or buffered, so it's actually closer to .69 ... I've been all over the net and can't find anything that accurately compares the outputs of pickups from different makers. I remember when I switched to EMGs, I was surprised at the lack of volume level increase, but the increased gain (if that makes sense).
 
Re: SH-4 JB or SH-5 Custom in Gibson Explorers

This has been bothering me for quite some time ... according to the EMG 81 specs, it has an RMS output of 1.25 V and a peak of 1.75 V. By comparison, the Dimarzio Super Distortion is 425mv (or .425V). I highly doubt the 81 is twice as loud as the Super Distortion, so perhaps "output" does not necessarily equal "volume" or "loudness". Then again, I read somewhere else that EMGs output is "split" or buffered, so it's actually closer to .69 ... I've been all over the net and can't find anything that accurately compares the outputs of pickups from different makers. I remember when I switched to EMGs, I was surprised at the lack of volume level increase, but the increased gain (if that makes sense).

This happens for a few reasons. First of all, volume (decibels) is a logarithmic scale rather than a linear one so you need 10x as much power to get a 2x increase in volume. The second reason is compression. When playing with overdrive / distortion the clipping results in compressed dynamic range so you hear the result as more gain rather than more volume.
 
Re: SH-4 JB or SH-5 Custom in Gibson Explorers

Frank Falbo helped me out when I asked for a few pickups compared to an emg in output and he said it was almost impossible to answer because the emg will clip on its own from the preamp if you pick hard, and a passive pickup will have a higher peak and more headroom which would lead to greater PERCEIVED output because the only thing clipping would be the amp. So it really depends on the player you are. Compared to an emg 81, a BW would likely sound cleaner and quieter when picked softly, but louder and more edgy when picked hard. My .02
 
Re: SH-4 JB or SH-5 Custom in Gibson Explorers

Taking the compression into consideration makes sense - embarrassed I didn't think of it ... I'm a real heavy-handed player which is probably why I didn't notice a spike in volume when I originally switched to EMGs (I was probably already peaking the C5 I had in my LP) ... It also helps explain why I always had to keep the master volume on the clean channel of my Mesa way lower than the crunch channel (I assume the gain of the amp was compressing the signal while the clean channel was free to open up with my heavy-handed attack) ... since I'm as heavy-handed as I am, I'm starting to think more and more that I should focus on a medium-output pick up ... (Wishing I didn't immediately rip out the Burstbucker 1 and 2 that came stock in my Explorer - literally swapped em out for EMGs before bringing it home - I'm an idiot - lol)
 
Back
Top