JMP/HBE
Well-known member
https://reverb.com/item/1739406-sol...h3QxwfoEAQYASABEgLizvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds&pla=1
Haven't seen this before ...
Haven't seen this before ...
It looks like the preamp board was gutted, and was just modified to a standard highwatt circuit for the pre, with out the beefy hiwatt power section. There’s not much slo circuitry left in it, just the logo. If mike was the one who did the work and can authenticate it, it’s one thing, but if that’s aftermarket gut job, that thing is as good as worthless.
:deal:Soldano / Hiwatt Rack mount...This is a very rare Soldano/ Hiwatt head built by Mike Soldano in 1988. It was 1 of 3 Mike made for Mark Younger-Smith guitarist at the time for Billy Idol.
It is a Hiwatt DR 103 front end with a Soldano SLO 100 power section. Truly a unique and fantastic sounding amp. The amp works just like a Hiwatt other than the inputs for the normal and bright channels are linked to 1 input ALA... David Gilmore.
This amp loves pedals and would compliment any pedal board setup. It is in amazing condition for it's age and is built like a tank and works flawlessly. Rack head... custom made head shell rack in black tolex (pictured) & ATA case included.
3rd owner of this amp and used it exclusively in my smoke free studio. Investment grade amplifier w/ great provenance...
Contact Mike Soldano with any technical questions regarding this amplifier...Regards
So what would be the advantage of a SLO power section versus a Hiwatt power section?
6L6 vs EL-34 would be obvious. Hiwatts with Partridge Trannies had plate voltages well past 500vdc.
Im guessing they're not getting 550 volts out of 5881's/6L6's.
It was a completely different output topology. Hi watts used a slightly higher ht for the plates, but ran the screens at a more comfortable voltage. It’s a super reliable way to run an output section and can increase output power if you do things right, especially if you run the screens from a separate isolated supply from the plate supply (Most hiwatts didn’t go that far), and use an OT with a suitable a-a primary load.
The 5881’s mike used are sovteks, which aren’t really 5881’s, they are just a close equivalent. They are rugged as hell Russian military equivalents that were used in military servos for bomber doors, and were designed to be used in extreme weather conditions in places like Siberia. The sovtek can take up to 500 or so volts in its plates but I wouldn’t run them like that given a choice.
El34’s are rated to take up 800v on the plates, but it’s the screens you have to worry about. Most can only take a maximum of 450v on the screens, and most amps that use them exceed this, and pretty much misuse them in general. It’s one of the reasons el34’s tend to have a reputation of a quicker burn out.
I seem to recall that 6V6's were designed to be smaller power tubes to fit in auto radios. Can't remember where I read that but it stuck in my head.
Al
5881 is the military part number for the 6L6GB the standard US beam tetrode tube of the 1950s. American beam tetrodes carry a alphabet subfix to indicate upgraded versions , such as 6L6A (19watts) followed by 6L6B (23 watts), 6L6C (30 watts)... 7581 is the military part number for a 6L6GC.
6L6 was originally RCA's version of a beam tetrode to compete with the British KT66. In American they were called beam tetrodes or beam power tubes. Later beam pentodes was also used to indicate they could be used in place of a pentode, but that doesn't mean they are pentodes. It either has beam forming plates or has a 5th element in the form of an suppressor grid. Not both. In England they were called Kinkless Tetrodes if it uses beam forming plates. Beam tetrodes and kinkless tetrodes are the same thing. GEC and MO Valves could not build pentodes because Philips/ Mullard held a patent on pentodes so they invented the kinkless tetrode which they shared with RCA. This was during the 1930s.
The modern Sovtec 5881 is actually equivalent to a 6L6GC.
In the photos of that Hiwatt/Soldano amp it looks like GE 6CA7s which are beam tetrodes that can be used in place of an EL34. But 6550s also look similar to 6CA7s.
![]()
the Mig back to CIA "Area 51" and reversed Engineered it. What they found was it wasnt the Mig that was better but that US Pilots lacked Dogfighting experience. Same thing in Vietnam but the fact that the F-4 had no internal gun [until later] & that more than 50% of Air to Air Missles either didnt come off the rail or failed to track caused alot of problems.
The Air Force came up with "William Tell" & the NAVY/USMC has Top Gun. What they found is if Pilots could get 10 missions under their belt they had a huge success rate. That is the purpose of those Programs.
I was an AO onboard USS CONSTELLATION CV-64 in 81-82, during Vietnam VF-96 the Fighting Falcons "Showtime 100" F-4J Piloted by LT, Duke Cunnigham & Rio LTjg Willy Driscol became the first ACES of Vietnam.
Now back to our regularly scheduled program ...
They actually drew the wrong conclusion. It was all about "corporate culture".
USAF and Navy ran their guys like a varsity football team, all pride and testosterone... Soviets ran theirs like an Olympics team, all discipline, rigour, and ice. Strict as hell, too. They ran their guys A LOT harder to compensate for disadvantaged hardware.
You can spot an old Soviet pilot from across a large room in any country, even 30-40 years retired. They all give off this unmistakeable relaxed-formidable vibe that's laid back enough to be admirable rather than terrifying. It's like "mellow Terminator mode", always-on, 24-7.