T-Tops

Chistopher

malapterurus electricus tonewood instigator
Anyone here tried real T-Tops? I've always gotten the feel that they were originally under respected because they kinda lagged behind modern tastes, and the Super D and other aftermarket pickups were seen as the key to unlocking sounds hitherto unattainable.

In the modern era, they are still a black sheep. Very hard to find pickups that advertise as T-Tops. But then again, some people like them, and the real ones are getting expensive
 
I've replaced a whole bunch of them over the years and never had a customer ask for one :-)

But like anything else, in the right guitar with the right rig and right circumstances I'm sure they could be great.
 
I love Patent Sticker T-Tops (late 60's) like in my Flying V or in a SG from the late 60's that I've periodically in maintenance (and whose bridge pickup has been repaired by the old freefrog, BTW): instant early Schenker or Angus Young tones but also gorgeous BB King vibes or clean sounds... Later iterations with engraved baseplates can be less exciting but gave me what I wanted during the early and mid 80's, in a Norlin "fretless wonder" 3PU's Custom with ebony fretboard.

For the record, Duncan Jazz / SH2's are really not far to be T-Tops with long magnets, neck/bridge variations and wax potting. Reminder about a topic that I have devoted to this question here: https://forum.seymourduncan.com/thr...utes-to-gibson-patent-sticker-t-tops.6255977/

Last but not least, I don't think T-Tops are "black sheeps". Gibson has released a "T-Type" supposed to clone them and various boutique winders had/have T-Tops style PU's in their catalog : see the multiple Jimi Page sets containing a bridge T-Top copy + a P.A.F. clone for neck position (by ReWind Electric, for instance) but also Manlius or the humbuckers sold by "Solodallas"...
 
Last edited:
The T-Tops started in mid 1967 to 1975. Then decals with the Pat. No. changed to an impressed Pat. No. in 1976. From 1977 on they carried a rubber stamped date. In 1981 Shaw took over and brought his PAF like bobbins. Some rare examples had one T-Top bobbin and one new in mid 1980. From June 1980 they became Shaws with the new bobbins, new magnet, new rubberstamp system and plain enamel wire. Just the baseplate, the slugs and the screws remained unchanged.
 
Last edited:
I like T-tops in neck position, had one at the neck on my main gigging Floydcaster throughout the 80s, and on quite a few Gibsons over the years.
They are fairly well-balanced and polite, crisp without being overly harsh. And don't impose a lot of their own personality on a guitar's sound.

It's a low output pickup, though; I prefer something a little more muscular at the bridge. Have traditionally swapped out T-top bridges since I use several guitars during a show and need them in the same ballpark outputwise.

Still, if you're only using one guitar and can dial your rig to suit them, they can be great.

I find it funny that they're being appreciated again - for many years you literally couldn't give them away.
Back in the 70s when people replaced them, they'd just toss them in the trash 'cause nobody wanted 'em.

BTW, T-tops are not the same as the Shaws, which were intended as a reissue of a good example of the notoriously inconsistent classic PAF. Tim's design used different bobbins, different wire, different wind, and different spacers. Can't say for sure, but I've been told Gibson didn't stick with Tim's specs very long, and that some later Shaws aren't the same as the earlier date-stamped ones.

I love the vintagey sound & dynamic of Shaws. Had to replace 'em in a number of my working guitars back in the day, though; they squealed badly at 1980s stage volumes.
 
I used to have a guitar teacher who had a 70's LPC that was a boat anchor, barely had any frets, and had microphonic and weak and thin-sounding pickups. Maybe under another context, I would've liked them, but I was EMG's or die back then. Still don't feel like they'd be my thing today, probably.
 
BTW, T-tops are not the same as the Shaws, which were intended as a reissue of a good example of the notoriously inconsistent classic PAF. Tim's design used different bobbins, different wire, different wind, and different spacers. Can't say for sure, but I've been told Gibson didn't stick with Tim's specs very long, and that some later Shaws aren't the same as the earlier date-stamped ones.
My Shaw is date stamped...with my 10th birthday.
 
He have one shaw and 3 different t-top, but all t-top are 2nd Generation from 1976 on. A lot of people say that the first Gen. with short magnets sound much fuller without giving up the crisp and well balanced sound. The 2nd Gen. is thinner sounding, which isn’t a bad thing in neck position of a Les Paul.
 
Last edited:
FWIW, T-Tops have most often a low DCR and low inductance but these two specs were rather variable on the models that I've measured these last decades and all of them were certainly not so low output pickups.

Some late iterations had ceramic magnets, for the record... And even my Flying V with short A5 loaded Pat. Numb. from 1968 is anything but weak. As I said, instant Schenker tone, which should mean something if I explain that several sets were tried in this instrument with the (wrong) idea that it would sound better... it has hosted vintage P.A.F. replicas with long RC A5, Stephens Design VL1, Skatterbrane with various kinds of magnets... All sounded good but the guitar sounds right only with the first gen. T-Top recipe.

I'll repeat myself by stating that 300k pots and covers don't help with T-Tops. A while back, I've tweaked a 1976 LP with covered ones by changing its 300k neck tone pot in a no load control and the sound opened itself in a magnificent way.
 
Back
Top