Re: Talk to me about Multi-fx pedals...
Ignore these puds. It is amazing to me - good tone has not changed in forever. Yet technology has made quantuum leaps forward.
What you thought was amazing and took a rack of doom and 200k worth of vintage gear can now be done with a Digitech RP250.
If you had the RP250 in a studio 20 years ago - they would have thought you were a musical genius.
But now "It sucks" or "It blows" or "yuck" Yet they can all reproduce the exact sound of nearly ANY of your favorite tunes tones
Not so much.
All that stuff existed 20 years ago, and it basically sucked then and it still sucks now. Though it has indeed become 'less sucky' then it ever was. 20 years ago, instead of being called the RP300 or whatever, it was the GSP21... or the ADA MP1... or any number of other things.
Several years ago I had a fairly known guitarist show up from LA to cut solos, fills and junk on a record at my place for a vocalist he was working with. Fly date. He brought a little rack... like a 2-banger.
One of the other guys on that brought an amp even though there were plenty of amps at the studio.
We must've spent an hour trying to get SOME KINDA 'tone' out of his rack processor... plugged it right into the DI on the Neve's... that sucks. Try different preamps... still sucks. Try a different DI? Lined right to the 2" 24-track?
Not happening.
Finally somebody, not I, makes the observation/suggestion that hey, there's a lotta cool amps here... why don't we use that VHT, or one of the Boogies, or that Fender...
Holy ****!
10 minutes later we had a tone.
F that modeling stuff.
If that's all 'ya have... ok... cool... run with it. Great performances, if you have something to say as a musician will shine through. Hopefully.
Otherwise, IMO multi-FX sucked and still suck.
I had a rack rig for a while and really grew to hate it after a lot of gigging.
So much easier to reach down and tweak a knob then scroll through menus...