Thoughts on the Brad Paisley Tele?

Chistopher

malapterurus electricus tonewood instigator
I did almost call this thread "Why would anyone want the Brad Paisley Telecaster?"

But I was wondering if any of you had any thoughts on this particular model. I checked the specs on Fender's website and it doesn't seem particularly spectacular. As far as I can tell the only thing that sets it apart is the pickguard and sparkle finish.

I guess Fender is just trying to start to reach out the to the modern country market. But at its price point and given most country guys just play one or two guitars, the target audience is very limited. If y'all know anything about it that makes it worth the Custom Shop prices, please let me know.
 
Re: Thoughts on the Brad Paisley Tele?

A student of mine brought one in last week. While it was a little um, over the top, for me, it was a nice guitar. It weighed like 5 pounds...very light. Chunky neck though (for my 12 year old girl hands), but I would consider another guitar made out of that wood, though.
 
Re: Thoughts on the Brad Paisley Tele?

I was thinking that at most all it could be is just a really nice guitar. There's nothing to really set it apart, it seems more like a color option than custom shop.
 
Last edited:
Re: Thoughts on the Brad Paisley Tele?

Well, the wood is different (paulownia body), and it is the lightest Tele I've ever played. It still dug into my ribs.
 
Re: Thoughts on the Brad Paisley Tele?

I guess that is a bit of a difference. What would be cool is a contoured thinline Tele made of paulownia. One of those made of the handpicked lightest possible wood would be worth custom shop prices. If you find a way to weight relieve the neck (maybe like Ibanez's Wizard necks) and pickups, you might be able to get one down to 2 pounds. To bad I'm not famous enough to have Any signature models...
 
Re: Thoughts on the Brad Paisley Tele?

2 lbs? is 5 lbs not light enough? are we men or are we devo?
 
Re: Thoughts on the Brad Paisley Tele?

I've heard it has a larger than most neck on it. Also, I think the pickups are not standard. While I don't like the finish, it has been a staple guitar design for him for many years and their used to be guitars like that back in the day.

As far as why wouldn't we want one? Brad is arguably one of the best chicken pickin' guitarists in country music. While there may be better ones, being a frontman who can play like him gives the most visibility to the craft than just about anyone.

How many lead vocalists are there in any genre that also double as the lead guitarist these days? Only a handful (which I'm sure people will respond to this thread with that info)
 
Re: Thoughts on the Brad Paisley Tele?

2 lbs? is 5 lbs not light enough? are we men or are we devo?

Given that my favorite Lester clocked in at just under 14 pounds, 2 pounds would be a welcome change.
Weight relieving did get it down to 10 though, so it's now playable for more than a half hour.
 
Last edited:
Re: Thoughts on the Brad Paisley Tele?

I suspect the name "Brad Paisley" is what the price increase is all about.
 
Re: Thoughts on the Brad Paisley Tele?

I've heard it has a larger than most neck on it. Also, I think the pickups are not standard. While I don't like the finish, it has been a staple guitar design for him for many years and their used to be guitars like that back in the day.

They come with Twisted Tele neck and a '64 bridge. And a pretty so-so relic job if I'm honest. Are those pretty nice pickups? I've never played anything with them.
 
Re: Thoughts on the Brad Paisley Tele?

Love the finish, love the pickguard, love the neck, not a fan of paulownia and the relic job looks asinine.
 
Re: Thoughts on the Brad Paisley Tele?

I think relic on Paulownia is simply because the guitar will ding just in the normal course of playing (as in even without hitting the body on something).....so it having been done already saves on disgruntled buyers.

But so far we have body, neck, finish and pickups being non-typical factory parts of the guitar......nope nothing special there needing a custom model.
 
Re: Thoughts on the Brad Paisley Tele?

But so far we have body, neck, finish and pickups being non-typical factory parts of the guitar......nope nothing special there needing a custom model.

I guess the body wood is uncommon enough, but the pickups are easy to find (like I said they are just a Twisted Tele neck and '64 bridge) and silver sparkle isn't that uncommon a finish, I've seen it on some Squiers. So other than that, all that really set it apart are the neck profile, a paisley pickguard, a subpar relic job, and custom shop prices. Maybe all that extra money is because they put paisley on a Paisley guitar.
 
Re: Thoughts on the Brad Paisley Tele?

the neck is the biggest I've ever played on a Fender. Maybe bigger than the old Beck model, even. If the body was any lighter, it would be seriously unbalanced. I would dig a contoured version, and one with a smaller neck. I am not a fan of the finish, though. The relic thing doesn't work for me at all, and not everyone likes bedazzled instruments.
 
Re: Thoughts on the Brad Paisley Tele?

I guess the body wood is uncommon enough, but the pickups are easy to find (like I said they are just a Twisted Tele neck and '64 bridge) and silver sparkle isn't that uncommon a finish, I've seen it on some Squiers. So other than that, all that really set it apart are the neck profile, a paisley pickguard, a subpar relic job, and custom shop prices. Maybe all that extra money is because they put paisley on a Paisley guitar.

If your definition of unusual for a custom guitar is that you simply cannot buy any of the parts or get any of the specs in ANY way apart from on that guitar then I think this is an argument manipulation simply as a vehicle to make a complaint.
Every single guitar coming from the custom shop can be made if you replace enough parts from a stock model. The WHOLE point of the custom is to get all of those things together.
 
Re: Thoughts on the Brad Paisley Tele?

If your definition of unusual for a custom guitar is that you simply cannot buy any of the parts or get any of the specs in ANY way apart from on that guitar then I think this is an argument manipulation simply as a vehicle to make a complaint.
Every single guitar coming from the custom shop can be made if you replace enough parts from a stock model. The WHOLE point of the custom is to get all of those things together.

Usually the point to a custom shop is that they tend to before more for "niche" items, in a way. Fender sells their normal line of products to appeal to the masses and the Custom shop is for people looking for something more specific. Most people can't find or afford actual vintage guitars, so they have their time machine series, and the artist series is so that people can have a copy of an artists signature guitar. Every now and then they come out with guitars that are interesting just to be interesting, like the Agave Strat.

The problem with the Brad Paisley Tele is that it doesn't really fit those roles. It is a roadworn model, yes, but that is not the point of the guitar, there are plenty of better options in a similar price bracket if that's what you are going for. Another odd choice is that they chose this particular guitar to be his signature model, as it is not his most famous guitar. His most well known guitar is his pink paisley Tele. Finally, the only boxes it ticks under "interesting" are Paulownia wood and a custom neck profile.
 
Re: Thoughts on the Brad Paisley Tele?

The problem with the Brad Paisley Tele is that it doesn't really fit those roles. It is a roadworn model, yes, but that is not the point of the guitar, there are plenty of better options in a similar price bracket if that's what you are going for. Another odd choice is that they chose this particular guitar to be his signature model, as it is not his most famous guitar. His most well known guitar is his pink paisley Tele. Finally, the only boxes it ticks under "interesting" are Paulownia wood and a custom neck profile.

There is no "problem" with the guitar. I own one and love it. This guitar was designed by Fender and Brad Paisley himself and isn't the embodiment of just one of his guitars; but the culmination of three. If you watch him, he goes in phases. He'll play one guitar for much of a tour then move to another one. One of his main guitars; and one of the guitars that was used to model the Fender signature Tele is his 63 that was refinished to silver sparkle. It, however, has a rosewood fretboard. If you want to get a guitar that's closest to what Brad plays, buy a Crook. The body is an "oreo" body. Spruce top and back with Paulownia in the middle. I and built a couple of Teles with Paulownia bodies and I like them; not necessarily for their weight, or lack thereof; but their tone. Tone and sustain just blooms from them. The BP sig is no different. The neck is a soft V shape and fairly chunky; but not super-huge. 9.5' radius with medium-jumbo frets. Say what you will about the relicing. It's not for everyone. Usually, I'm not a fan. This relicing works for me. I played this guitar in the store and it played, sounded, and felt like I had owned it for 20 years; really spoke to me. Pickups are Twisted Tele in the neck and 64 in the bridge. I don;t know if the 64 model is a standard production pickup. It's a little louder and fatter than a standard 50s/60s bridge pickup; very usable for many genres besides Country.

Yes, I have always been a big Brad Paisley fan. I don't really like signature model guitars through. I have owned a few; guitars that I really liked that did or didn't matter if they were signature models. One of my very favorite Telecasters is owned by Matt Rae; a player in New England. It's a Custom Shop gold sparkle. I don't go out of my way to look for sparkle finishes; when, actually, pastels (daphne blue, surf green) are my favorites. I did change out the paisley pickguard to a 1964 type 3-ply parchment with no neck pickup screw holes. I didn't like the paisley' but I wanted to put my own little spin on the guitar.

As far as price, yes it's at the top of the price list for a MIM guitar; but the the Mexican factory uses the same necks and bodies and the Cali factory does. I love the vintage type hardware and that's mostly the same as the US hardware too. I did install a set of Dunlop Straplocks; but I do that on every guitar.

So, bottom line for me is that I love this guitar. It feels like I have owned it and played it for several years. Could they have done some things better? Yeah, but that's with every guitar.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top