Re: Tremelo Question?
On the matter of sustain and tone, please stick with me;....this is a LONG one!
My old Les Paul with thick mahogany and maple top vibrates when I pluck the note, of course, and some woods vibrate longer; ergo, Normal Les Pauls vibrate not only longer with both of those woods, but the "tone" of mahogany vibrates at a lower frequency than the maple, which vibrates at a higher frequency, at least to my ears. My LP sounds not only low and full (mahogany) but also I hear a tighter, higher frequency (maple). Thus Les Pauls' decades of dominance in the guitar world. Yes, some mahogany and maple are more dense and less dense. I can hear this through an amp up to a certain level, but when you have multiple gain stages and pedals, it can get lost.
O.K. As they used to say. Dig this: Hendrix played through 2 or 3 Marshall stacks. When you hear him without his fuzz face on, it is clear his tone, while powerful, is still "crisp": A Stratocaster made with higher frequency woods like alder or hard ash, with a decked vibrato. So you CAN hear the real sound of wood and metal even loud. So, when you listen to Eric Clapton in Cream, he was also playing 2 Marshall stacks sometimes, but with no "fuzz" pedals, you can hear how much fuller his guitar sounds, that is mahogany and maple. A lot of times he would use an SG, made out of mahogany, again a low frequency wood. The bridge and saddles of the "Clapton" type guitars is really screwed into and really a part of the whole. Therefor they (strings) vibrate longer, the wood vibrating longer means the strings will vibrate longer and at different frequencies than a Strat, which will not vibrate as long, as the bridge is not nearly a part of the guitar as is a Gibson. Thus the thinner Stratocaster sound: higher frequency wood and less vibration.
Thus comes the idea of "hey, lets make a thicker, harder block so the Strat will sound "deeper" and maybe vibrate more, i.e. sustain. Brass and steel are not only pretty good choices, but being metal, their is not a LOT of choices. Titanium is just to far out there for me. What's next? A block made from the Jetsons' metal spaceship? I hope you get my well meaning sarcasm. I do use a brass block, I personally think it sounds better, a little deeper tone, but as far as sustain goes, not so much.
I know that a humbucker will make a big difference by making the sound much fuller, but it still sounds like a strat. I A/B'd my Humbucker strat against my humbucker Les Paul and there was no contest. My strat, while sounding fuller, still sounds like a strat.
Leslie West had a Mahogany Les Paul Jr., no pedals, and a one piece bridge. His strings would vibrate long enough for the amp to start ringing back in sympathy (meaning the same note) with the guitar ringing winding up in a controlled feedback on almost any note. Ever noticed you can get a lower note to feedback at that frequency than a high note that will feed back but sometimes it is more of a squeal and not the same note! Lower notes are more likely to feedback as they cause a bigger vibration in the wood that causes the wood to vibrate longer, thus the string vibrates longer, increasing the chance of sympathetic feedback.
Yes, I ramble a lot, but I think if you follow my reasoning, you will understand why many people will spend a lot of money to make their strats sustain and sound deeper. Also this post I hope explains why decking a strat makes more vibration (sustain) as decking it causes the bridge to become more of a transfer point of string vibration to the strat body, again, causing the strings to help the wood vibrate longer and thus making the strings themselves vibrate longer. This paragraph is my attempt to sum it all up. If I said anything wrong I am sure I will hear about it, but I feel my explanation is worth reading. I repeated myself a couple times, but only to help.
SJB