So are you talking about using a mix pot where the center would be out fully out of phase?
Yore wrong. it's merely a matter of reversing the two coil connections. A stereo pot should be able to do it.It's not possible because you have to have ground at one end of a coil and positive at the other end. You can't have a situation where you have ground and positive at both ends of a coil and still have it induce a current.
Your wrong. it's merely a matter of reversing the two coil connections. A stereo pot should be able to do it.
"You're wrong"
Maybe if you give away some more pickups he will believe you?
Is it possible to use a blend or balance pot to get variable phase for a pickup in relation to another pickup?
Thanks, Will
Most interested indeed!It doesn't work like you'd think. It ends up being like a combination volume control and phase switch. One half of the turn is in phase, the other half of the turn is out of phase, and it turns the volume to 0 at the center crossover point. But that variance can be useful, however. For example, on my SG right now I have the Jimmy Page wiring and the best out of phase tones are where I turn one or the other volume down slightly so they are relatively out of balance to each other. So this phase blend might be an interesting idea for a guitar that only has a master volume, rather than separate volumes per pickup.
FYI - I tested this by using alligator clip wires to attach a pan/blend pot to a 498T, then coupled that output with a 490R to a single instrument cable into a powered monitor and tap tested the pickups with a metal knife resting across both pickups and tapped it while turning the knob.
"You're wrong", anyway, if you're that confident, I'd be interested in seeing a diagram for "variable phase".
It doesn't work like you'd think. It ends up being like a combination volume control and phase switch. One half of the turn is in phase, the other half of the turn is out of phase, and it turns the volume to 0 at the center crossover point. But that variance can be useful, however. For example, on my SG right now I have the Jimmy Page wiring and the best out of phase tones are where I turn one or the other volume down slightly so they are relatively out of balance to each other. So this phase blend might be an interesting idea for a guitar that only has a master volume, rather than separate volumes per pickup.
FYI - I tested this by using alligator clip wires to attach a pan/blend pot to a 498T, then coupled that output with a 490R to a single instrument cable into a powered monitor and tap tested the pickups with a metal knife resting across both pickups and tapped it while turning the knob.
My bad. Yawn wrong !
Will you make a graph of it ? and improve the design ?
Why would you want a graph?
Why would you want a graph? You're not making sense to me. You had said I was "wrong", and I'm just asking you to elaborate. It's a straightforward and reasonable request.
OP asked if there was a way to get "to get variable phase", specifically, "[out of phase] at one end, in phase at the other and variable from in between", ... his words. What you and others are talking about with a stereo pot, or dual gang pot, would be able to switch the phase, but only achieve a "variable amount of volume", and act as a typical blending pot. It would not achieve a "variable amount of phase", as phase is either "in" or "out", and cannot be a blend of the two at one time. IMO it would make more sense to simply use a push/pull pot in that case, for simplicity sake and availability of parts.
You apparently don't know the first thing about mixed signals.
And how, exactly, would a push-pull pot achieve "variable" anything? That's an on-off switch, my friend.
Leave the electronic advice to those who actually understand electronics, please!
What value pot did you try ? Also hacking the pot to no load would probably get rid of the volume effect.