Iron1
New member
Re: What is closest to a Black Winter, tone-wise?
That was why I suggested having the 3-bar on the opening page, then the 32 accessible via a deeper dive on the details page. And, yeah, it's definitely more art than science.
Yeah, it really is subjective. Some people love the Invader, some hate it - and these are people who play similar styles of music.
I don't know that an extended graph would be any more meaningful than the three-bar chart. IMO it would just take up more space on the product pages and scare off a subsection of potential customers (on account of looking too technical). I find the current three-bar chart very helpful in giving me a quick visual read on a given pickup -- don't underestimate how immediately useful and accessible it is -- but of course it's not everything. The chart, clips, playing, listening, trusting your own sense of what you want, knowing that a pickup will sound a certain way in someone else's guitar but not yours -- that's why it's an art, not a science.
That was why I suggested having the 3-bar on the opening page, then the 32 accessible via a deeper dive on the details page. And, yeah, it's definitely more art than science.
The 3-bar graph has been incredibly inconsistent in my own experience, but there's not much else to go on. Outside of trying a pickup on your own, through your own setup, there's no "perfect" way to relay how a pickup sounds. I mean, look...as a group, we can't even agree on what is/isn't closest to a Black Winter! Tone is so subjective. That said, I'm the most right![]()
Yeah, it really is subjective. Some people love the Invader, some hate it - and these are people who play similar styles of music.