Gtrjunior
Well-known member
Re: What's the fat on these Nightswans?
Dale,
All due respect. But is there any way you can work on shortening your post to essential information?
Every time I see that you’ve written a book I skip right over your post. No offense but I don’t have that kind of time or desire to read 14 paragraphs.
Hello.
Wow!!! Didn't see any of THAT coming that's for sure!!! LOL!!! I think it's time for me to unsubscribe from forums for a while (that should make some around these parts happy to hear!!! LOL!!!) i.e. I seem to have a knack for "putting my foot in it". And here I was just trying to give the OP some "fat" on the Nightswans!!! LOL!!!
The above being said: I don't think it fair to just leave this "hanging out there" although THIS TOO being said it's sure not my intention to start one of those proverbial "shi*tstorms" either. And @metalchurch79: in no way am I questioning your take on things or information that you may be privy to that I am not so please bear this in mind. I just believe I need to comment on a few things i.e. at least comment on my take on things.
Interesting about the "Lightning Storm" graphic. Until I saw your post (@metalchurch79) I'd no idea that this whole thing had gone further. I did indeed look up Craig Patchin and, true enough, such award was made on 4 December 2018. As noted: I wasn't aware of this at the time of my posting. For anybody interested here's a link: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/dimebag-darrell-estate-dean-guitars-181827296.html.
Sidenote: the more controversy the better for my guitar not??? LOL!!! I wonder if, given the above, Buddy is allowed to continue and complete the series with the "Lightning Storm" artwork???
I have corrected the details of my initial post on the VC-II (my) guitar by the way (for the sake of accuracy) i.e. it's based on the Nightswan I and not on the Nightswan II (sorry: my bad i.e. too many "Swans" and I get confused at my age and after all these years of "abuse"!!! LOL!!!). Specs. are identical to the Kramer Nightswan Marketing Brochure of the day (including R1 nut). The Nightswan II was very different (pickups, recessed Floyd, different body shape, different selector switch, one or two other things).
I cannot really comment comprehensively on the notion that Buddy may not have had anything to do with the design of the original Nightswan. I can only say that based on my research (one of the reasons I ordered and paid premium for "The Vivian Connection"!!! LOL!!!) I'm personally convinced that he did. There's a lot of info. on these guitars on the Internet backed up by Vivian himself so far as I can tell. Aside from anything else there's at least three different video interviews with Buddy and Vivian together discussing the origin and specs. of these guitars. But then again: THIS IS THE INTERNET!!! LOL!!! (This being said: it's hard to argue with a video).
As far as workmanship is concerned: my experience is way different. Put another way: some around these parts believe I suffer from OCD (which, in fairness, based on my "epic" Vivian thread, is understandable let's face it and, maybe, there's at least a little truth to this). Point is I am "full of it" and pedantic when it comes to this type of thing. And I certainly was not the easiest or most accommodating of customers either (to the point where at some point I figured Buddy and Joyce were gonna tell me to "beat it" and it would not have surprised me) (but they didn't obviously!!! LOL!!!). So all I can tell you is that my guitar is really and truly absolutely perfect in every single way. And not just me being biased either i.e. a few (select???) people (including our best known luthier in this country) have had the privilege of "handling" it and in all cases comments have been far more than simply complimentary. The thinness of the neck and extreme low action seem to be highlights??? All have been most complimentary of the tone and rave about the sustain (this thing can hold notes for DAYS if you allow it to!!! LOL!!!). UNFORTUNATELY for ME: it's not the tone I was after (but this sure ain't Buddy's problem or fault i.e. I didn't know "sh*t from shovel" insofar as hand made guitars are concerned when I ordered it). So my "case queen" (love that description!!! LOL!!!) gonna stay that way. Turns out I need a full scale, Alder body, with Invaders to get my tone (well: this among other things of course) i.e. same spec. as Vivian's 1983/1984 white Charvel (which apparently I'm intent upon making famous!!! LOL!!!). So yeh. Sanity and finances willing: will get Buddy to make the beast early next year (but no: no red squares on white background with skulls not unless I can lay my hands on THAT white Charvel which, I guess, would become a second "case queen"!!! LOL!!!).
And I agree with the notion of building your own (whatever guitar) or having it made. I've had two (USA) Charvels and one (USA) Jackson Soloist over the years (I'm not including my two current Jackson Dinkys in this comparison as they're cheaper, Chinese factory, models and I've spent a fair amount of money on them getting them to "my spec. and standards"). Absolutely amazing and beautiful guitars (referencing the USA stuff for the sake of fair comparison). But there is "something" about a hand made and hand crafted instrument (albeit that this was first time delving into this). And really: there's not much difference REALLY in price between some of the (factory???) artist signature and custom models and hand made. I guess the point is: get a quote (from ANY luthier of your choice) anyway as you may be pleasantly surprised (I certainly was and this in spite of my paying a hefty premium for "The Vivian Connection"!!! LOL!!!).
Anyways and to the OP: if it's "FAT" you wanted then I reckon it's "FAT" you got!!! LOL!!!
Regards,
Dale.
Dale,
All due respect. But is there any way you can work on shortening your post to essential information?
Every time I see that you’ve written a book I skip right over your post. No offense but I don’t have that kind of time or desire to read 14 paragraphs.

