Which guitar rocks hardest?

Seriously though, those are really cool looking guitars:
xebu46gkgfjwcavbdwag.jpg
 
If someone gave me a Tele, I wouldn't immediately smash it into kindling.

Sent from my SM-A115A using Tapatalk
 
The amp is far more important than the guitar as long as it's not a full hollow body. I'd take vintage single coils into a 5150 over an RG into a Princeton.

And Keith Richards. And Jimmy Page. And Bruce Springsteen. And John5. And Mike Campbell. And Graham Coxton. And Joe Strummer.

What is this? The 1950's? Most of those guys don't "rock hard" at all.

Sent from my SM-G970W using Tapatalk
 
Gotta go BC Rich, for the ultimate hardest....
But any LP has that heaviness too, so only a BC Rich is gonna beat it.


Personally, that is the fugliest body shape bar none. And yes, I'm including the Moderne.
The only redeeming qualities are cloud inlays on the left one (because my LPc) and the snakeskin on the right. Oh, and tiny switches and knobs.
 
To me, the Les Paul just screams rock and roll, although I'm willing to listen to the discussion. After all, that's why I posted the thread.

It was a silly, yet simple question. And as usual, with something silly and simple (and intended as light and fun) people get serious and complicated.

You know, when I think about it, it's not about the guitar. Or the amp. Or even the cabs and pedals. The cables maybe? No, where was I going with this? Oh right.
TO ME, the guitar that rocks out the most is the one in the hands of a long haired pentatonic superstar substance abuser from the 70s-80s, no matter if it's a balalaika plugged into an router or bagpipes plugged into an iron lung.
IT'S ALL ABOUT RRRCK'N'RRRL YEAAH BAY-BEE!!

There. F your guitars and amps and everything.
:baby:
 
It was a silly, yet simple question. And as usual, with something silly and simple (and intended as light and fun) people get serious and complicated.

You know, when I think about it, it's not about the guitar. Or the amp. Or even the cabs and pedals. The cables maybe? No, where was I going with this? Oh right.
TO ME, the guitar that rocks out the most is the one in the hands of a long haired pentatonic superstar substance abuser from the 70s-80s, no matter if it's a balalaika plugged into an router or bagpipes plugged into an iron lung.
IT'S ALL ABOUT RRRCK'N'RRRL YEAAH BAY-BEE!!

There. F your guitars and amps and everything.
:baby:

Attitude is extremely important!
 
I'm a dad, and I want to rock. . . . and I do find myself drawn to Les Pauls.

I mean, this has been talked about before that Gibson has an image problem with being sort of the "old man's guitar". The last real big guitar hero can think of that's really known for playing an LP is Slash - and he's really in the older Gen X territory. And it's been an issue with Gibson's marketing for the last decade as well with Gibson mainly focusing on the Gen X and Boomer crowds.
 
Les Paul: The official guitar of Dad Rock.

I think Fender does a much better job of getting their instruments in the hands of younger artists for endorsements. Gibson has had a few swings and misses in this area. The biggest being the Jonas Brothers models.

q8acixmon4xqbdiieyhm.jpg
 
I mean, this has been talked about before that Gibson has an image problem with being sort of the "old man's guitar". The last real big guitar hero can think of that's really known for playing an LP is Slash - and he's really in the older Gen X territory. And it's been an issue with Gibson's marketing for the last decade as well with Gibson mainly focusing on the Gen X and Boomer crowds.

But aren't they the ones with money? Doesn't seem like an unreasonable business move.
 
Back
Top