ExplorersRock
X-Files Duckbucker
Re: Why bolt on?
This is exactly the point I was trying to make. It has become what it has become. If someone thinks it looks dumb because it's incorrect, I find that kinda silly.
As kind of an example, take the term "Dual-Exhaust." That term gets thrown around anytime you have two mufflers, and occasionally when you have a a pipe coming out of each side of the car (think the Camarro "Y"-pipe from the 80's & 90's). As an example, I have a Honda Accord w/a V6 sporting "dual exhaust." The two exhaust manifolds (headers) run into the cat and become one pipe. Then after the cat, they split in a "Y" to go to two separate mufflers. But technically, to be dual exhaust the two exhausts should be entirely separate. But since we have colloquially accepted my Honda Accord to have "dual exhaust," we now refer to complete separation as "True Dual Exhaust." I don't think this makes automobile designers or engineers look stupid. It seems like insisting on using only the technically correct definition of dual exhaust and changing the other terms to something like "Dual Muffler" exhaust because that is the correct definition is standing on unnecessary principle for the sake of OCD. We all have accepted what Dual Exhaust means (notice that I dropped the quotations) and for those who wish to make the distinction we have the term True Dual Exhaust. If it ain't broke...
Screws use the substrate for fastening and bolts add a nut for fastening. The whole thing is colloquial terminology with a few reasonable reasons. Copywriting or just laziness, the point is that its now defined colloquially as essentially meaning the same thing and as such is interchangeable when used in context.
This is exactly the point I was trying to make. It has become what it has become. If someone thinks it looks dumb because it's incorrect, I find that kinda silly.
As kind of an example, take the term "Dual-Exhaust." That term gets thrown around anytime you have two mufflers, and occasionally when you have a a pipe coming out of each side of the car (think the Camarro "Y"-pipe from the 80's & 90's). As an example, I have a Honda Accord w/a V6 sporting "dual exhaust." The two exhaust manifolds (headers) run into the cat and become one pipe. Then after the cat, they split in a "Y" to go to two separate mufflers. But technically, to be dual exhaust the two exhausts should be entirely separate. But since we have colloquially accepted my Honda Accord to have "dual exhaust," we now refer to complete separation as "True Dual Exhaust." I don't think this makes automobile designers or engineers look stupid. It seems like insisting on using only the technically correct definition of dual exhaust and changing the other terms to something like "Dual Muffler" exhaust because that is the correct definition is standing on unnecessary principle for the sake of OCD. We all have accepted what Dual Exhaust means (notice that I dropped the quotations) and for those who wish to make the distinction we have the term True Dual Exhaust. If it ain't broke...