Discharged
New member
Re: Why does'nt SD offer a Antiquity 59 set
And even if you give six Franklins in a 100% "correct" set, like the Throbak, Re-Winds or other boutique winders offer, it's no guarantee whatsoever that it'll be the arguably "best" for that specific instrument.
Having given the choice of getting a "set" or two identical p'ups just because it's "correct", I'll choose the set any time of the day and twice of sundays.
To close the argument: I'm CURRENTLY using an A3n/A2b-modded, nickel-covered, '59 set on my ES-339. It provides the "right" inherent tone-footprint for the Smooth Jazz project band I play with. I could've used a myriad of other much more expensive p'ups, but my "lowly", modded '59s give a run for their money to other p'ups costing at least three times as much, and then some.
/Peter
That's the thing: correct, is not. Good? It's excellent. Actually, NOBODY offers two identical p'ups and promotes it as "period correct" set. Because, although being "correct", it wouldn't be "good", if you ask me. A neck p'up and a bridge p'up should be different. That's the best solution... it's just not "correct" or "Period correct".So even the Seth Antiquity with the A2 that SD sells is not correct either......
And even if you give six Franklins in a 100% "correct" set, like the Throbak, Re-Winds or other boutique winders offer, it's no guarantee whatsoever that it'll be the arguably "best" for that specific instrument.
Having given the choice of getting a "set" or two identical p'ups just because it's "correct", I'll choose the set any time of the day and twice of sundays.
To close the argument: I'm CURRENTLY using an A3n/A2b-modded, nickel-covered, '59 set on my ES-339. It provides the "right" inherent tone-footprint for the Smooth Jazz project band I play with. I could've used a myriad of other much more expensive p'ups, but my "lowly", modded '59s give a run for their money to other p'ups costing at least three times as much, and then some.
/Peter
Last edited: