170? or 85/85?
Why not 100 or 50/50, or 50 25/25, or a 300/150 for bass?
Why 170?
Because a group of people with far more electronics experience than yourself decided that was a good number, that's why.
Yeah, well, you were not one of them. I'm asking as a guitar player. As the Customer, I'd want 20, 30, 50, or 100.
I guess that means SD has more power amp knowledge than every other amp builder in the history of ever. Don't think so.
Electronic experience/knowledge does not equal market knowledge/sensibility.
Because a group of people with far more electronics experience than yourself decided that was a good number, that's why.
For the guy always wanting more...170 is more than 20, 30, 50, 100.
Aren't there tube amps at 18 watts? I think an H&K, plus Fender did a Bassbreaker 18/36 combo.
I get that it is designed for clean headroom. Obvious 70 extra watts does that. But if using a modeling amp or pedal or whatever, do you really need more than 100?
Does the extra 70 really add that much?
And while there are extra features on the 200, is the extra 30 enough to warrant that?