Dave Locher
New member
I know this seems like a really dumb question. I know humbuckers were developed to "buck" the hum.
BUT...unless you're using higher gain than players used back in 1958 it's really not that big of a difference. When I split the coil on my guitar there is no huge jump in hum unless I have the preamp pegged pretty high into distortion territory. I played a strat for a while years ago and the hiss and hum weren't bad at all unless I had an overdrive on or had my preamp cranked.
I have never played through an honest-to-goodness 1950s tube amplifier. Were they noisy as heck? Was electrical wiring inherently noisier back then? What I am wondering about is why they felt the need to reduce the 60-cycle hum when it wouldn't seem to have been much of a problem at that time, given the accepted guitar tone of the day? (Sparkling clean or slightly snotty.)
It would make a lot more sense to me if they were developed in the mid- or late 1960s when everyone was cranking their amps and/or running fuzz boxes.
BUT...unless you're using higher gain than players used back in 1958 it's really not that big of a difference. When I split the coil on my guitar there is no huge jump in hum unless I have the preamp pegged pretty high into distortion territory. I played a strat for a while years ago and the hiss and hum weren't bad at all unless I had an overdrive on or had my preamp cranked.
I have never played through an honest-to-goodness 1950s tube amplifier. Were they noisy as heck? Was electrical wiring inherently noisier back then? What I am wondering about is why they felt the need to reduce the 60-cycle hum when it wouldn't seem to have been much of a problem at that time, given the accepted guitar tone of the day? (Sparkling clean or slightly snotty.)
It would make a lot more sense to me if they were developed in the mid- or late 1960s when everyone was cranking their amps and/or running fuzz boxes.
Last edited: