What exactly was the "mirrored surface" that was attempted to be trademarked?
Was it *all* metallic pickup covers (nickel, gold, chrome, etc.)? That seems crazy if true.
Or just chrome ones? Or maybe the application refers to the chrome bobbins that Dimarzio uses?
The proposed mark is the mirrored surface of electronic sound pickups for guitars and basses, and the goods are electronic sound pickup for guitars and basses. The particular features of this proposed mark, namely, the mirrored surface, are functional for the goods because goods of this nature often have a stainless steel or mirrored surface.
yeah, I was also thinking that was applying to those chrome ones
![]()
Bobbin Toppers anyone? ... http://www.universaljems.com/cart/bobbin.htm
Floyd is a technology. Cream is a color. Not even the same thing.
I think there are less and less guitarists every year interested in double cream. New players like black, and weren't born in a time where double cream was a thing.
You'd be wrong about that.
You'd be wrong about that.
Floyd is a technology. Cream is a color. Not even the same thing.
The original goal was $100,000
Not only that, but patents thankfully have an expiration date. The trademarks on colors do not.
I want to remind people that DiMarzio also held a rather questionable patent....
Younger players are not seeking out double cream. I think the market lies with 'players of certain age'.