super rad stuff
Skaforlifeologist
Re: A GROWLY Sound for a Les Paul
the CC isn't very much higher output than a paf-level pickup, it just has a higher resistance rating because it's wound with a thinner wire. for a growly sound though, i'd definitely not go CC. it's very fat and somewhat smooth, and would probably be a better tonal match with an a2pro neck. phat cats on the other hand are very cool too, but i wouldn't exactly call them growly or smooth. they're very unique in that they behave like a humbucker, they just have more high end clarity and hum. you could get them to growl, but not with their a2/a2 magnets in each one. also they're not really matched output wise, with the neck sometimes overpowering the bridge. if you want a bit more grit and output in the bridge, i'd say a8/a5 and for the neck maybe a4/a3.
I checked the specks on a CC and man-o-mam they have huge output. Too hot for me I think. I want the tubes and amp to drive the tone so I want low output.
I am afraid p-90 will be trebely in the bridge and PG too. Any other options, or a I wrong about this?
the CC isn't very much higher output than a paf-level pickup, it just has a higher resistance rating because it's wound with a thinner wire. for a growly sound though, i'd definitely not go CC. it's very fat and somewhat smooth, and would probably be a better tonal match with an a2pro neck. phat cats on the other hand are very cool too, but i wouldn't exactly call them growly or smooth. they're very unique in that they behave like a humbucker, they just have more high end clarity and hum. you could get them to growl, but not with their a2/a2 magnets in each one. also they're not really matched output wise, with the neck sometimes overpowering the bridge. if you want a bit more grit and output in the bridge, i'd say a8/a5 and for the neck maybe a4/a3.