Re: Annother Interesting Read About Gibson
It seems that I read this somewhere before, but I didn't comment on it. I will now.
While I don't care for Gibson anymore, I have to stand up for them just a little. They're not the ones to blame here. They are doing what any smart business would do. If you see a deficiency of a product that you can sell and make a profit, you're stupid not to, if you're in the business to make money. I can't blame them for wanting a piece of that (probably) million dollar market.
The problem is that parents need to be educated on the matter. There are some that know the guitars are junk and intentionally buy them to shut their kids up, knowing full well that the guitar will be thrown under the bed or used as a coat hanger in a couple of weeks. Those parents need to either put their foot down and not waste the money or let their kid try something out that they have the potential of enjoying. You shouldn't make up the child's mind for them.
The other parents need to be taught that these instruments are junk and their child will most likely never learn to play on that guitar. True, there may be some that do, but there are others that have the potential to grow into great musicians that get discouraged and give up because they can't play a 2x4 with a few strings stretched across it. They need to be shown that if they make the investment their kids have a potential, and if they end up not liking the guitar, they didn't really lose any more money. A First Act guitar or one of these "Gibson"s will have NO resale value. A real Gibson or Fender will not lose that much value in a few weeks.
Sorry for the rant. It's just my $.02