Ants vs PG?

Re: Ants vs PG?

they are both great pups, some of my favorites but they are fairly different. neck models? bridge models?
 
Re: Ants vs PG?

Not a fan of either. Ant's have aged (degaussed) A2 magnets, which gives them a weaker sound (fully charged A2's are pretty low output to begin with). Never bonded with PG's. To me, the neck is too warm and rounded & the bridge is too bright. Some players like a big difference in EQ between bridge and neck PU's, I'm not one of them.

I am a big fan of Seth's and A2P's however, two more of Duncan's PAF-ish A2 pickups. Always work well for me.
 
Re: Ants vs PG?

I was always under the impression that the Seth was the same wind as Antiquity, but with a fully charged magnet?
 
Re: Ants vs PG?

I was always under the impression that the Seth was the same wind as Antiquity, but with a fully charged magnet?
They say so, but little more turns of wire on the coils of the Ants. Another point is, that the Seth are said to have matched coils. The original PAFs had randomly matched coil from different batches and the Ants should therefore have slightly mismatched coils, too.
 
Re: Ants vs PG?

the seth was made to be the ideal paf that seth lover designed, matched coils. the actual pafs that came out had a good amount of variation since coils had different #'s of turns and two coils were grabbed and thrown together to make a pup. the ant's ive owned have all had coils that seemed matched but had more turns of wire than the seth
 
Re: Ants vs PG?

Huh, I have a set of Seths in the drawer. I also have some 2.5" roughcast A2 mags that I was going to swap into an Ant set.

How similar are the two?
 
Re: Ants vs PG?

they are both great pups, some of my favorites but they are fairly different. neck models? bridge models?
Yes, they are both great. i've owned and played both and even though they are both excellent pickups, they sound very different to each other.
But i prefer the PG's by some margin
I have a CS set in one LP, and a standard set in another guitar, and they are both my favourite sounding guitars.
To me, the PG's typify the PAF sound i hear on records i love
 
Re: Ants vs PG?

The Pearly Gates neck has got to be one of the best neck pickups I've ever had, period. They can be a bit dark in a 24.75" scale guitar, but in a Strat they have pretty close to the perfect EQ. Slightly rounded highs, a raunchy upper mid hump, and a lack of the overzealous bass that can plague certain neck pickups. I actually find that they bond better with the Custom Shop version of the Pearly Gates as opposed to the production model, which is kind of odd.
 
Re: Ants vs PG?

I'm aiming at set vs set. I want to put them in the C-1 Classic (maple/walnut neck through mahogany wings and rosewood board), since I have two metal guitars now. Didn't want to be too specific as to get a wider opinion as to why either or. What's your expierience with them, or what else would you recommend? I've read Seth/Ant neck and a PG bridge would be great for a little more versatility. According to videos and samples here, Seths and Ants are pretty close, but I feel that Ants sound sweeter.

blueman335: So PGs, in your opinion, will work better on a brighter guitar?
 
Re: Ants vs PG?

See, I think PGs only work on a balanced, or darker guitar. I think in a brighter guitar, they would make it more bright, which usually isn't a sound I go for.
 
Re: Ants vs PG?

Mincer: So then I'm looking for more of a Seth vs PG then, huh? I'm definately no looking for a brighter sound... Thanks man. I'm looking at videos now, and it's so hard to choose between those two sets.
 
Re: Ants vs PG?

you can order seths with 4cond, dont think you can do that with antiquitys
 
Re: Ants vs PG?

PGs are pretty bright, and I'd always choose the Seths over them. But I don't like bright guitar sounds- the Seths are smooth. The PGs are like regular PAFs, with more high end.
 
Re: Ants vs PG?

my seth bridge is brighter than my pgb in the same guitar. the pg has a big upper mid peak but the seths high end definitely seems brighter, its more even sounding but brighter.
 
Re: Ants vs PG?

I've found if I roll the tone back to 7-8 then a PG sounds like any other good LP/PAF to me, but I have the option of some top end I can bring back in if I'm running into a dark amp or in a dark/non-reflective room. The PG neck isn't warm to me. It's chimy and blends well with the bridge. The only better necks IMO are the Jazz, Seth or 496R. The wiring type (50s/Modern) and pots (500k vs 300k) have an affect on how they sound, so that is probably why you hear mixed opinions on the same pickup.

I don't have experience with Ants. I have Seths. They are to sound what sparkle paint is to vision (sometimes looks black, sometimes looks like multiple colors). Sometimes my Seths sound bright and Fendery/twangy in certain guitars through certain amps and speakers, and other times it sounds like a warm mid-range honk through other guitars, amps and speakers.
 
Back
Top