stevie_bees
Cat In The Hatministrator
Don's (d1dsj) recent PRS purchase, and a eBay auction I recently looked at got me thinking.
Can boutique guitar makers justify the costs of some of their guitars?
Now, I understand the quality of the materials that go in to each of these instruments is high quality and therefore more expensive, and I also understand the extra care, attention, skill and manhours that go in to building them. Don's Modern Eagle wears it's boutique stature very clearly on its sleeve, but I saw an auction for a Collings 290 DC, which is essentially a Les Paul Double Cut Junior, and it's BIN was £2469.
Where do you get to a point of paying for all the plusses of a boutique instrument, to being ripped off slightly??
I realise there isn't really an answer, but I'm intrigued where you think the cut off is?
I just thought that £2469 was a little too much for a Les Paul Junior, even one of the highest standard...
Disclaimer: This doesn't include the prices for vintage instruments, which are a law unto themselves...
Can boutique guitar makers justify the costs of some of their guitars?
Now, I understand the quality of the materials that go in to each of these instruments is high quality and therefore more expensive, and I also understand the extra care, attention, skill and manhours that go in to building them. Don's Modern Eagle wears it's boutique stature very clearly on its sleeve, but I saw an auction for a Collings 290 DC, which is essentially a Les Paul Double Cut Junior, and it's BIN was £2469.
Where do you get to a point of paying for all the plusses of a boutique instrument, to being ripped off slightly??
I realise there isn't really an answer, but I'm intrigued where you think the cut off is?
I just thought that £2469 was a little too much for a Les Paul Junior, even one of the highest standard...
Disclaimer: This doesn't include the prices for vintage instruments, which are a law unto themselves...