Buffer vs Better Cable
- Thread starter Guitar Toad
- Start date
Guitar Toad
Toadily Stratologist
Re: Buffer vs Better Cable
Well, Lava man. It looks like you've got the goods. What the best bang for the buck cable? IYHO.
If you can say.
Most around here say George L. What say you?
Lava Man said:
Well, Lava man. It looks like you've got the goods. What the best bang for the buck cable? IYHO.
If you can say.Most around here say George L. What say you?
Last edited:
James Rock
Active member
Re: Buffer vs Better Cable
I wish wireless didnt kill tone and wasnt so damn expensive (i want to walk freely on stage not trip and break the socket on my guitar cos of it)
I wish wireless didnt kill tone and wasnt so damn expensive (i want to walk freely on stage not trip and break the socket on my guitar cos of it)
James Rock
Active member
Re: Buffer vs Better Cable
the leads to my amp (from pedals) always get in the way (im a singer centre stage)
the leads to my amp (from pedals) always get in the way (im a singer centre stage)
Zerberus
Baron Von Shred
Re: Buffer vs Better Cable
LOL.... :beerchug:
While I'm always a bit wary as soon as anything is done w/ radio frequency (I worked too long as a Taxi-dispatcher to really trust radios), a good wireless is IMO and IME the most effective way to transfer the signal from a guitar with minimal loss of clarity
I´m curious, could you please define "kill tone".... About 90% of the wirelesses I´ve used were clearer and more open in response than any cable I´ve tried, the very much akin to switching from A "250k MVol/MTone" to a "500k MVol only" pot setup... practically no effect on the low end, save maybe a minimal extension to the range. Is this your experience as well or did it "kill" something else?
msawitzke said:I love the wireless concept: We go crazy over strings, picks, pickups, pots, caps, wire, nuts, bolts, frets, neck pocket specs, tenon lengths, scale, fret size, pickup height, etc. and then we broadcast our tone via UHF!
LOL.... :beerchug:
While I'm always a bit wary as soon as anything is done w/ radio frequency (I worked too long as a Taxi-dispatcher to really trust radios), a good wireless is IMO and IME the most effective way to transfer the signal from a guitar with minimal loss of clarity
James Rock said:
I´m curious, could you please define "kill tone".... About 90% of the wirelesses I´ve used were clearer and more open in response than any cable I´ve tried, the very much akin to switching from A "250k MVol/MTone" to a "500k MVol only" pot setup... practically no effect on the low end, save maybe a minimal extension to the range. Is this your experience as well or did it "kill" something else?
Last edited:
James Rock
Active member
Re: Buffer vs Better Cable
well i heard they add noise and make everything really glassy and harsh.
well i heard they add noise and make everything really glassy and harsh.
Similar threads
- Featured
