Re: Chambered vs. Weigh-Relieved
I have a 2004 G0 and a 2009 CR8.
The differences are the neck size, and year. That's it. I did upgrade pots (550K) and caps in the 2004 but Gibson does this now in 2009, so the electronics are close. The BB's in the 2004 are wound a little hotter than the 2009.
I'd say the solid have more chunk and punch, good for palm muting. More "modern" sounding. Good for stuff up to Megadeth.
The chambered is more open and sounds more like a 50's LP, good for AC/DC, Tesla, old Def Leppard, etc.
I know these threads have been done before but they always seem to go into some other direction and there isn't a lot of relevant discussion about the tonal differences as much as the weight, etc...
In my opinion there is a significant difference. Not a big difference, but significant. Chambered sounds a bit airier, defined, and more transparent. Weight-relieved sounds a little more compressed, nasal, and solid. That's my interpretation of it.
What are your opinions and preferences?
I have a 2004 G0 and a 2009 CR8.
The differences are the neck size, and year. That's it. I did upgrade pots (550K) and caps in the 2004 but Gibson does this now in 2009, so the electronics are close. The BB's in the 2004 are wound a little hotter than the 2009.
I'd say the solid have more chunk and punch, good for palm muting. More "modern" sounding. Good for stuff up to Megadeth.
The chambered is more open and sounds more like a 50's LP, good for AC/DC, Tesla, old Def Leppard, etc.