http://www.backflashband.net/dimarzio.mp3
heres a link someone else did on one of my threads
so thats a sound sample of the new 36th ann. PAF? sounds nice!
J, that sounded sweet man!Yeah that clip was done with my Les Paul into a VHT Pittbull Super 30! I actually sold those pickups for some hotter pups and then started to regret it...............I just ordered another set:banana:
was wondering?
has anyone tried the air classic bridge pup?
heard it was real sweet also
thanks for the info on emI had 2 sets in my hamer and agile for a few years.
the neck is the sweet AC...The bridge can be a little harsh with 500k pots but it compliments the neck perfectly...A great set!
but its no PG set or 59 set...
I thought the seth lover was practically the real thing? Or maybe the antiquity? But I am curious to hear how an A2 '59 would sound...
They use the Dimarzio-patented Airbucker™ technology, just like Seth Lover's original PAF humbuckers...
:smack:
Or you could practically get the real thing by swapping an A2 magnet into a '59, and degaussing it to taste.
I thought the seth lover was practically the real thing? Or maybe the antiquity? But I am curious to hear how an A2 '59 would sound...
from what i have read so far the new 36th paf is just a bit warmer/smoother,Is it that much better than the VPAF?
My take is that the 36th anniv. is a modern take on the old design with new technological "improvemenets"-thats its not intended to be an exact replica like a Seth. is this right?
from what i have read so far the new 36th paf is just a bit warmer/smoother,
Tech Talk: The PAF® 36th Anniversary Bridge model has the best qualities of the Virtual PAF® bridge and Virtual Hot PAF® pickups and then some. It’s as loud as the VHPAF™, but has as much low-end and midrange definition as the VPAF™ bridge model. The highs are actually bigger and smoother than either model. The 4-conductor version also splits very well. Single-coil mode is bright, but not at all sterile-sounding.
I'd like to hear how they compare the the pearly gates set... I may have to pick up (no pun intended) a used '59 sometime to try that.
edit: Also, Dimarzio doesn't use airbucking technology because degaussed magnets are unreliable, they use it because it's cheaper to build plastic spacers than it is to degauss each magnet to the correct gauss. Also, it means that they can buy even larger stocks of A5, rather than A5 and A2, thus allowing them to cut costs even more. Nothing wrong with that though, their literature is just a bit misleading.