Dimarzio Mo'Joe review

UberMetalDood

New member
I wasted no time installing it in my RG1570 this morning. I've been playing it all day. In very few words it's like a modernized PAF Pro. The difference between it and a PAF Pro is that it basically has a hint more midrange and is a little tighter. Other than that it's not much of a departure from a PAF Pro.

It's great for single note soloing but it's also really great at chords. There's a lot of definition so even with fairly high distortion you can hear every note. It's kind of in between a FRED and a PAF Pro in that it has wonderful harmonics. It still has that percussive quality that the PAF Pro has. I think the presence is all there just as the PAF Pro but if you ever thought the PAF Pro was icepicky, then the Mo'Joe has rounded that off just a smidge.

It's not thick like a Tone Zone, nor it is thin either. I would say it has a smidge less "wah" than the PAF Pro. I want to say it's a smidge flatter too whereas the PAF Pro has a hint more dimension. It has a nice growl with power chords.

The balance of this pickups EQ is a lot like a Seymour Duncan Custom Custom. It leaves you wanting just a little more bass but it has plenty of midrange to go around. It's the closest thing Dimarzio has to a Custom Custom.

This is a really cool pickup and the output is med-high. I have it paired with an Air Norton neck and it's well balanced.

Here's the thing. At this point, after only having it for 1/2 a day, I am inclined to say that it has a better clean/clean breakup sound than overdriven sound. The clean tone is amazing on this pickup. I can see why Satch would love it.

This pickup would fit into the "bright" category as a Seymour Duncan EVH or Custom Custom would fit. You would think that since Satch uses a fairly bright amp (JSX or Marshall JVM) that this combination would be really bright, but in some magical way it works without becoming harsh.

I used my Engl Screamer which is a fairly bright amp. I had the Bass set at 11:00, middle at 10;30, treble at 12:30, and presence at 1:00.

Then I set my bass at 11:30 mids at 12:00, treble at 12:00, and presence at 12:00 and started to achieve a nicer balance. How nice that you can add some bass to your sound and not become overpowering. It was still pretty bright but adding the mids back to a neutral position filled the tone out a little bit.

I compared this to a very similar guitar I have (RG3550) which has a Tone Zone + Air Norton. It's not as thick as the Tone Zone and stands out more in the mix.

Now here's the craziest thing... Just for kicks, I installed the Mo'Joe in my Gibson Les Paul Traditional std which has 57 Classics. I was blown away! It sounded really really good. It became thicker and more authorative, the low end filled out and it sounded very similar to a Burstbucker Pro! It paired well with the 57 Classic neck.

I still can't believe how cool my Les Paul sounds now. It has given me an itch to order a nickel covered Mo'Joe for my Les Paul. Could it be that I just stumbled upon something or is it because Joe Satriani once said that the inspiration for his guitar sound came from a Les Paul?

Now I have questions. Does Satch own a few Les Pauls? If so, does he have Mo'Joes installed in them?

I'm still scratching my head wondering why this pickup sounds better in my Les Paul than my basswood RG1570. It seems like the Mo'Joe was tailor made for a Les Paul.

Overall it's a very interesting pickup. I like it because it's basically a modded PAF Pro, but I love it because it makes my Les Paul sound so cool.

I want to add that my initial impression of this pickup was that it was a little thin, however, I discovered that is not the case. After recording a few minutes of it, I can tell that it comes through much meatier than I initially thought. This pickup has a lot of clarity and it's the way the presence stands out in this pickup that you get that impression. Underneath that presence is a fairly strong midrange and a moderate amount of bass. It's not a thin sounding pickup overall, but it's not going to be real thick like a Tone Zone.
 
Last edited:
Re: Dimarzio Mo'Joe review

Nice review! So you'd definitely recommend it in mahogany? Any chance of putting up some clips of it in your LP?
 
Re: Dimarzio Mo'Joe review

Nice review! So you'd definitely recommend it in mahogany? Any chance of putting up some clips of it in your LP?

Yes it works nicely in mahogany. Just think of a PAF Pro in a Gibson. That's pretty much how it sounds. I put it back in my RG1570 last night, but if I order the nickel covered Mo'Joe, I'll make a clip.
 
Re: Dimarzio Mo'Joe review

Sounds like a pu i will have to try out. i just made a trade for a paf pro,fred and vhpaf so i have to give them a test run first but i want to also try this mo joe and air classic and breed as well.
 
Re: Dimarzio Mo'Joe review

I wonder if the Mo'Jo would work better with a mahogany Ibanez versus basswood. What string gauge are you using? I know that Joe bumped up to 10s and that played a role in a new pickup model.
 
Re: Dimarzio Mo'Joe review

I had a Mo'Joe and put it in three guitars; in my 75 Les Paul, which is a bright guitar, it sounded terrible, not even musical. I put it an SG copy made of basswood and it sounded soooo good, with just a hint of sharpness on top. I then put it in my 73 Les Paul Deluxe, and it sounded like it was meant to go in that guitar. Playing by myself, it lacked a bit of bass, but in the band mix it was perfect. Full and big and it cut through spectacularly. Sounded great with the band in the SG clone as well, but the Brobucker sounds better in that one. I love the Mo'Joe.
 
Re: Dimarzio Mo'Joe review

I wasted no time installing it in my RG1570 this morning. I've been playing it all day. In very few words it's like a modernized PAF Pro. The difference between it and a PAF Pro is that it basically has a hint more midrange and is a little tighter. Other than that it's not much of a departure from a PAF Pro.

It's great for single note soloing but it's also really great at chords. There's a lot of definition so even with fairly high distortion you can hear every note. It's kind of in between a FRED and a PAF Pro in that it has wonderful harmonics. It still has that percussive quality that the PAF Pro has. I think the presence is all there just as the PAF Pro but if you ever thought the PAF Pro was icepicky, then the Mo'Joe has rounded that off just a smidge.

It's not thick like a Tone Zone, nor it is thin either. I would say it has a smidge less "wah" than the PAF Pro. I want to say it's a smidge flatter too whereas the PAF Pro has a hint more dimension. It has a nice growl with power chords.

The balance of this pickups EQ is a lot like a Seymour Duncan Custom Custom. It leaves you wanting just a little more bass but it has plenty of midrange to go around. It's the closest thing Dimarzio has to a Custom Custom.

This is a really cool pickup and the output is med-high. I have it paired with an Air Norton neck and it's well balanced.

Here's the thing. At this point, after only having it for 1/2 a day, I am inclined to say that it has a better clean/clean breakup sound than overdriven sound. The clean tone is amazing on this pickup. I can see why Satch would love it.

This pickup would fit into the "bright" category as a Seymour Duncan EVH or Custom Custom would fit. You would think that since Satch uses a fairly bright amp (JSX or Marshall JVM) that this combination would be really bright, but in some magical way it works without becoming harsh.

I used my Engl Screamer which is a fairly bright amp. I had the Bass set at 11:00, middle at 10;30, treble at 12:30, and presence at 1:00.

Then I set my bass at 11:30 mids at 12:00, treble at 12:00, and presence at 12:00 and started to achieve a nicer balance. How nice that you can add some bass to your sound and not become overpowering. It was still pretty bright but adding the mids back to a neutral position filled the tone out a little bit.

I compared this to a very similar guitar I have (RG3550) which has a Tone Zone + Air Norton. It's not as thick as the Tone Zone and stands out more in the mix.

Now here's the craziest thing... Just for kicks, I installed the Mo'Joe in my Gibson Les Paul Traditional std which has 57 Classics. I was blown away! It sounded really really good. It became thicker and more authorative, the low end filled out and it sounded very similar to a Burstbucker Pro! It paired well with the 57 Classic neck.

I still can't believe how cool my Les Paul sounds now. It has given me an itch to order a nickel covered Mo'Joe for my Les Paul. Could it be that I just stumbled upon something or is it because Joe Satriani once said that the inspiration for his guitar sound came from a Les Paul?

Now I have questions. Does Satch own a few Les Pauls? If so, does he have Mo'Joes installed in them?

I'm still scratching my head wondering why this pickup sounds better in my Les Paul than my basswood RG1570. It seems like the Mo'Joe was tailor made for a Les Paul.

Overall it's a very interesting pickup. I like it because it's basically a modded PAF Pro, but I love it because it makes my Les Paul sound so cool.

It really doesn't make any sense to me how you can compare it to a CC and then turn around and call it bright? It can be one or the other but not both. :)
 
Last edited:
Re: Dimarzio Mo'Joe review

what u think?
gibson-lp90_satriani-gibson.jpg
 
Re: Dimarzio Mo'Joe review

It really doesn't make any sense to me how you can compare it to a CC and then turn around and call it bright? It can be one or the other but not both. :)

It does if you're comparing the overall EQ... lots of mids, presence, and a little lack of low end - pretty much what I was talking about in the review.
 
Re: Dimarzio Mo'Joe review

It does if you're comparing the overall EQ... lots of mids, presence, and a little lack of low end - pretty much what I was talking about in the review.

You described the CC and the MoJoe as bright and even went on to elaborate:

This pickup would fit into the "bright" category as a Seymour Duncan EVH or Custom Custom would fit. You would think that since Satch uses a fairly bright amp (JSX or Marshall JVM) that this combination would be really bright, but in some magical way it works without becoming harsh.
 
Last edited:
Re: Dimarzio Mo'Joe review

You described the CC and the MoJoe as bright and even went on to elaborate:

Well you can brood over it all you want, but the CC is arguably a fairly bright pickup. I have installed the Custom Custom in a few guitars and I would characterize it as more or less a bright pickup that lacks low end. There are obviously some parallels with the Mo'Joe. I stand behind my review regardless of how much you want to argue the pragmatics of it.
 
Re: Dimarzio Mo'Joe review

Well you can brood over it all you want, but the CC is arguably a fairly bright pickup. I have installed the Custom Custom in a few guitars and I would characterize it as more or less a bright pickup that lacks low end. There are obviously some parallels with the Mo'Joe. I stand behind my review regardless of how much you want to argue the pragmatics of it.

That is just factually inaccurate. Period. Empirically, it is not bright. Guys install it specifically to tame high end in guitars. You can stand behind anything you like. Doesn't make it true
 
Re: Dimarzio Mo'Joe review

I'm going to have to disagree as well. I don't hear the Mo'Joe being similar to the CC either. It doesn't have near the midrange, and is a lot brighter with almost single coilness in the highs. Still has a nice unthin tone tho. ;)
 
Re: Dimarzio Mo'Joe review

I'm going to have to disagree as well. I don't hear the Mo'Joe being similar to the CC either. It doesn't have near the midrange, and is a lot brighter with almost single coilness in the highs. Still has a nice unthin tone tho. ;)

Well you can disagree but I dare to state that you don't have experience with either pickup. First of all, Dimarzios are known for having a very pronounced midrange in their pickups. Part of the reason pickups like the PAF Pro and Mo'Joe have a vowel like character is because of the midrange quality they make them with.

The Custom Custom is full of mids and lacking in bass, and that's a fact. The Mo'Joe was developed because Satriani wanted to boost the midrange of his FRED (a slightly modified PAF Pro). The Mo'Joe definitely has a lot of midrange so to say "it doesn't have near the midrange" of a Custom Custom is simply inaccurate.

It's also apparent that the Mo'Joe, PAF Pro and FRED are all relatively low in the bass range than many other Dimarzios. The Mo'Joe and Custom Custom have relatively the same amount of bass.

I know this because I've already installed both pickups in different guitars. You can disagree or deny what you like, but you can't deny the fact that there are some parallels with Custom Custom.

I rest my case.
 
Last edited:
Re: Dimarzio Mo'Joe review

I'm not saying you ain't pretty or anything, I just don't think the Mo'Joe and CC are much alike.

FYI I probably had a CC in a Les Paul before you started playing and I have a Mo'Joe in my hand that I just took out of my PRS SE. ;)
 
Re: Dimarzio Mo'Joe review

Fair enough. It's all about individual perception anyway. The point I was originally trying to make was not necessarily that I thought it sounds like a Custom Custom but that it shared a similar EQ and looseness. That's all I'll say about it at this point though.

In any case I think it kills in a Les Paul. Have you tried one in a Les Paul? What kind of sound were you getting with it in your PRS?
 
Re: Dimarzio Mo'Joe review

I wasted no time installing it in my RG1570 this morning. I've been playing it all day. In very few words it's like a modernized PAF Pro. The difference between it and a PAF Pro is that it basically has a hint more midrange and is a little tighter. Other than that it's not much of a departure from a PAF Pro.

It's great for single note soloing but it's also really great at chords. There's a lot of definition so even with fairly high distortion you can hear every note. It's kind of in between a FRED and a PAF Pro in that it has wonderful harmonics. It still has that percussive quality that the PAF Pro has. I think the presence is all there just as the PAF Pro but if you ever thought the PAF Pro was icepicky, then the Mo'Joe has rounded that off just a smidge.

It's not thick like a Tone Zone, nor it is thin either. I would say it has a smidge less "wah" than the PAF Pro. I want to say it's a smidge flatter too whereas the PAF Pro has a hint more dimension. It has a nice growl with power chords.

The balance of this pickups EQ is a lot like a Seymour Duncan Custom Custom. It leaves you wanting just a little more bass but it has plenty of midrange to go around. It's the closest thing Dimarzio has to a Custom Custom.

This is a really cool pickup and the output is med-high. I have it paired with an Air Norton neck and it's well balanced.

Here's the thing. At this point, after only having it for 1/2 a day, I am inclined to say that it has a better clean/clean breakup sound than overdriven sound. The clean tone is amazing on this pickup. I can see why Satch would love it.

This pickup would fit into the "bright" category as a Seymour Duncan EVH or Custom Custom would fit. You would think that since Satch uses a fairly bright amp (JSX or Marshall JVM) that this combination would be really bright, but in some magical way it works without becoming harsh.

I used my Engl Screamer which is a fairly bright amp. I had the Bass set at 11:00, middle at 10;30, treble at 12:30, and presence at 1:00.

Then I set my bass at 11:30 mids at 12:00, treble at 12:00, and presence at 12:00 and started to achieve a nicer balance. How nice that you can add some bass to your sound and not become overpowering. It was still pretty bright but adding the mids back to a neutral position filled the tone out a little bit.

I compared this to a very similar guitar I have (RG3550) which has a Tone Zone + Air Norton. It's not as thick as the Tone Zone and stands out more in the mix.

Now here's the craziest thing... Just for kicks, I installed the Mo'Joe in my Gibson Les Paul Traditional std which has 57 Classics. I was blown away! It sounded really really good. It became thicker and more authorative, the low end filled out and it sounded very similar to a Burstbucker Pro! It paired well with the 57 Classic neck.

I still can't believe how cool my Les Paul sounds now. It has given me an itch to order a nickel covered Mo'Joe for my Les Paul. Could it be that I just stumbled upon something or is it because Joe Satriani once said that the inspiration for his guitar sound came from a Les Paul?

Now I have questions. Does Satch own a few Les Pauls? If so, does he have Mo'Joes installed in them?

I'm still scratching my head wondering why this pickup sounds better in my Les Paul than my basswood RG1570. It seems like the Mo'Joe was tailor made for a Les Paul.

Overall it's a very interesting pickup. I like it because it's basically a modded PAF Pro, but I love it because it makes my Les Paul sound so cool.

I want to add that my initial impression of this pickup was that it was a little thin, however, I discovered that is not the case. After recording a few minutes of it, I can tell that it comes through much meatier than I initially thought. This pickup has a lot of clarity and it's the way the presence stands out in this pickup that you get that impression. Underneath that presence is a fairly strong midrange and a moderate amount of bass. It's not a thin sounding pickup overall, but it's not going to be real thick like a Tone Zone.

Have you tried the Paf Joe in your LP, neck position? Only cause I have a Super Distortion in the bridge, but having trouble deciding on a neck pickup. Actually I am in **** load of problems..too many options. I have Jb/Full Shred, Duncan Custom/Jazz, and Dimarzio Super Distortion(already in a Epi LP I just bought)/???
 
Re: Dimarzio Mo'Joe review

Oh and I am now playing through a Marshall Vintage/Modern w/ basic pedals. ISP Decimator, Maxon Compressor, Fulltone Fulldrive2, MXR Analog Delay, Dunlop Dimebag Wah.
 
Back
Top