Liko
New member
Re: Disappointed with 2016 Gibson
Sent from my VS985 4G using Tapatalk
Especially since the 2009 Fender trademark decision set the precedent that the overall aesthetics of a guitar are not trademarkable (especially if you don't rigorously defend against infringement). PRS could make an exact copy except the feedstock and legally Gibson wouldn't have much to say given what Ibanez has been putting out for decades.I'd take a custom 22 while not as pretty as a gibson I wouldn't say they're ugly.
What frustrates me is every two bit guitar maker in the world make a visual clone of a LP so why doesn't PRS just go out and make the best LP in the world & when gibson gets their panties in a twist all they have to do is pull out a cheap chinese burny & go 'what's yer fekin' problem?'
Sent from my VS985 4G using Tapatalk