I tested one a year ago with great expectations. I tried out a few Fenders, a real high-end Tokai and the ESP. The Tokai and the ESP were no match for the Fenders. I expected it to be the opposite. I walked home a very happy man with a 50th Anniversary US Stratocaster. YMMV. I really wanted to like the ESP as I own an M-II that I like but it just wasn't up to my standards, far from it. Too bad they didn't have any more of them to try. Not that I'm complaining, the Strat I picked has been all I've hoped and more.
That sounds odd. What didn't you like about it?
I'll try to remember... I think that it was the overall tone that was disappointing. The specs are great and I have good experiences with ESP so I thought that it was the one I was going home with. I think that it played pretty well and had solid hardware but somehow it just wasn't that resonant as the fenders.
Aha......since when?I'm firm in the camp of U.S. made instruments have good unamplified qualities much more often than Asian instruments
There are some great Asian made guitars, but it does seem that USA made ones are better quality, unamplified or not.I'm firm in the camp of U.S. made instruments have good unamplified qualities much more often than Asian instruments, so this doesn't surprise me at all.
Hard to believe the SSL-1s screwing up a guitar unless it's made of maple or 500 Kohm potis were used.
Now, while I was blaming wood quality for what I observe in the past, these days I think that at least partially this is the fault of hardware (namely harmonics eating bridges) and manufacturing details, such as excessive gluing or painting. You can see in Asian made pickups that they are epoxied to death, because somebody followed the "no feedback" instructions and nobody checked sound in 1:1 situations.
If I needed to buy a guitar without playing it the Asian guitar would have to be much cheaper for the same on-paper specs.
They come with those SSL1 pickups so could that be the problem?
Aha......since when?
And now regarding the Made in Asia vs. Made in US... Wood is wood. Hardware is hardware. Competent craftsmanship is, you guessed it, competent craftsmanship. There's no reason in this time and age that a company anywhere in the World can't acquire those three things if they have the money for it. And regarding the fourth ingredient in making good guitars... there's no magical fairy dust that's only available to the US companies to sprinkle over their guitars to make them intrinsically better than guitars made elsewhere.
If you are the head of an Asian guitar maker, how to you justify doubling your yearly wood bill to your shareholders when most of your customers either don't care that much about sound, buy mailorder or expect Asian instruments to have lesser wood to start from?
The world's guitarists are not very equal-opportunity buyers. U.S., Japan, Mexico, Korea, China - in that order they expect the "hidden" properties such as tone wood to be. Without a major marketing campaign you cannot just slam in more expensive wood and expect people to notice or believe it.
Plus a Protones Tune-O-Matic costs real money, a significant portion of the price of an Asian instrument.
Well I have also had a very fair share of guitars......I think the probaility to pick up an US dud is somewhat bigger...as the quality of most guitars from the70s throughout today is quite uneven.
Most of mine ended being Japanese guitars, since they usually just worked from day one....and did not need alot of work to become playable for normal work!
Most I encountered where better off growing on as trees....
But that is how it goes....there is no magic anywhere....only bad or good work!