Overpriced. I can't see paying $900 for a LPJ
I don't see anything flame worthy those are some beautiful guitars. I love the cream double cut with the P90s.
Overpriced. I can't see paying $900 for a LPJ
i've played some of them. the new neck profile just feels wrong on a les paul. its very similar to the old 61 sg reissues, wide and flat. doesn't feel bad per se, but just feels weird on a les paul. the tuners i don't like, the new headstock signature is lame, the zero fret is pointless to me, and the new case is just bizarre for a gibson.
i'm all for trying new things and looking for new ideas in guitar, but when you have such a great legacy as gibson does, why not offer at least one guitar made the way a lot of people really want?
Not an ebony board on any of them and I am sure they will be substituting richlite for it anyway. Nothing jumps out at me much but the Special DC has some promise. Kind of pointless for me to bash Gibson been my number 1 guitar for 33 years, it was $400 though and that was a fortune for a 19yo kid.
Regarding auto-tuners, to me I just think "something else to break that I probably can't fix easily myself", and if you are used to tuning on the fly I can't imagine it being much help. I assume they have batteries or something? Like I want that hassle to deal with in the middle of a damn show.
I can't imagine that they will last. I don't blame Gibson for trying something new, in fact I think it's cool that they try new stuff; and there may be players that dig 'em, but just offer them as a factory option/upgrade no different from color instead of shoving them down everyone's throat, making people yank them off and put Grovers on them.
My problem with the auto-tuners is they rob young players of a valuable ear training lesson. Listening to the frequencies align as you learn to tune a guitar is one of those ah ha moments. Electronic tuners have robbed a lot of guitarists from the valuable lesson of learning to listen, auto-tuners are 10 times worse. Knowing the instrument is 90% of the craft.