gregory
New member
Re: Fender Stratocaster American Standard from 73
Personally, I think discounting pickups you've never heard based simply on their brand is a mistake, but that's your prerogative. DiMarzio really excels at hotter-than-vintage stacked single coils. Their dynamics are unsurpassed.
Anyhow, it really depends on what you want. There must be some reason you decided on an SSL-3. That's a pretty bold move. I have no reason to question it, but it does steer you in a specific direction, as does choosing an SSL-6 for the neck. If these are really what you want then I would definitely go noiseless instead:
Bridge: STK-S9
Middle: STK-S6
Neck: STK-S6
The only difference from my previous recommendation was the S6 in the neck instead of the S7. The S6 is quite a bit hotter and darker than the S7; whereas the STK-S7 is just slightly warmer and more muscular than a vintage single, but still has plenty of sparkle.
In case it helps, here's the list of Duncan stacks in order from weakest to hottest:
STK-S4(N/M)
STK-S7*
STK-S4B*
STK-S6
STK-S9
Be aware that there is a little jump in output between the S4 and the S7 and then a bigger jump to the S4B and then a smaller jump to the S6 and then a bigger jump to the S9. I've left out the YJM Furys which are weaker than the S4 as well as the non-traditional pole piece designs. This is based on Seymour Duncan output ratings on the product website. Take with a grain of salt.
If it were me and I were to choose Duncans with an S9 in the bridge and S6 in the neck, I'd be more more inclined to go with an S4B in the middle. However, because I'd like my cleans to sound more like a Strat, I'd likely opt for an S7 in the middle and an S4B in the neck (or vice-versa). Though, if I wanted a hot set of single coils, I'd go with DiMarzio.
*) Based on the data on the SD website I strongly question whether the STK-S4B is actually hotter than the STK-S7!
Personally, I think discounting pickups you've never heard based simply on their brand is a mistake, but that's your prerogative. DiMarzio really excels at hotter-than-vintage stacked single coils. Their dynamics are unsurpassed.
Anyhow, it really depends on what you want. There must be some reason you decided on an SSL-3. That's a pretty bold move. I have no reason to question it, but it does steer you in a specific direction, as does choosing an SSL-6 for the neck. If these are really what you want then I would definitely go noiseless instead:
Bridge: STK-S9
Middle: STK-S6
Neck: STK-S6
The only difference from my previous recommendation was the S6 in the neck instead of the S7. The S6 is quite a bit hotter and darker than the S7; whereas the STK-S7 is just slightly warmer and more muscular than a vintage single, but still has plenty of sparkle.
In case it helps, here's the list of Duncan stacks in order from weakest to hottest:
STK-S4(N/M)
STK-S7*
STK-S4B*
STK-S6
STK-S9
Be aware that there is a little jump in output between the S4 and the S7 and then a bigger jump to the S4B and then a smaller jump to the S6 and then a bigger jump to the S9. I've left out the YJM Furys which are weaker than the S4 as well as the non-traditional pole piece designs. This is based on Seymour Duncan output ratings on the product website. Take with a grain of salt.
If it were me and I were to choose Duncans with an S9 in the bridge and S6 in the neck, I'd be more more inclined to go with an S4B in the middle. However, because I'd like my cleans to sound more like a Strat, I'd likely opt for an S7 in the middle and an S4B in the neck (or vice-versa). Though, if I wanted a hot set of single coils, I'd go with DiMarzio.
*) Based on the data on the SD website I strongly question whether the STK-S4B is actually hotter than the STK-S7!
Last edited: