Gibson "Quality"

Re: Gibson "Quality"

MikeRocker said:
Do you honestly think that it costs Gibson more to make an instrument than Heritage? ...?

You specifically stated "The volume of guitars Gibson builds and sells means the cost of raw materials and labor for each is a lot less", and I was commenting specifically on the labor part... How many people do you think are willing to take a pay cut because their company is doing well?? I sure as hell won´t, And I´m pretty sure most others would at the very least be pissed. BTW, I never at any point in time stated whether GIbson or Heritage has a higher overhead, because I have access to neither´s books, others here evidently do... :rolleyes:

Your comment implies that making 10 guitars in a series is significantly less work (and /or can be done by less qualified people) than making 10 individual guitars. And that´s just plain WRONG, physically , theoretically and logically, as long as you´re making all the parts yourself.

And as companies grow, and employees are acquired, employees start demanding more benefits... ex. I can guarantee you that when PRS was a small lone person in his basement peddling his guitars backstage at shows he did NOT have a Matching 401k, Disability, Health, Dental, paid Holidays..... That´s just absurd, He was praying to ****ing god that nothing happens to him like everyone else... These days, even an entry level employee at 8$ an hour has these benefits...

When you outsource neck and body production to China, THEN you start saving money.... But as long as you´re paying an american laborer his 15-25$ an hour plus benefits, it´s gonna cost......... And IMO as long as you HAVE a job in the USA and are earning a similar sum or more (which I assume most professionals do as luthiers aren´t known for their wealth), then I now I challenge you to show me where YOUR Salary is justified, regardless of what you do.... I mean, if luthiers don´t have to eat, why should anyone else have to.

If you don´t have in-depth inside knowledge about the guitar manufacturing and retail world, you´re much better off not passing judgement, or at least listening to what real insiders are saying...the Guitar industy is NOT consumer electronics where everything only gets cheaper and cheaper and cheaper because silicon prices are still falling and indonesian labor costs nothing.....

Au Contraire, It´s an industry where ALL the raw materials are constantly becoming more expensive (I assume that you´ve heard about the rainforests shrinking, species becoming endangered and timber companies raising salaries, and of course the general ecological problems of woodcutting, sometime in the last 30 years, even though they for some reason judging by the arguments don´t apply here, and even if they did they don´t cost money?)

Add on to that the average workers desire for more than dry bread (read: Pay raises due to inflation just to keep the living standard), but those don´t cost either.... That gas, Oil, electricity and water are constantly getting more expensive is also a negligible factor, especially since US companies have to pay for more expensive equipment to fulfill environmental guidelines that many far east companies DON`T have...

Am I getting touchy: Yes.... Because people that have obviously never built a guitar in their lives outside of a parts axe are essentially saying, whether they realize it or not, that Luthiers and guitar makers in general are overpaid bastards that have nothing else in their minds but money money and more money (not how to pay the rent next week, I beg of you, we all live in 250 room mansions :rolleyes::)....

Maybe I should start up on how I feel that the costs of carpenters or Masons are too high, after all they´re just putting nails and glue into wood or smearing mortar on bricks.... Or Lawyers, all they did was study for years..... EVERY job looks easy as hell when you´re not willing to open your mind up to the actual work involved.....:yell: :evil:
 
Last edited:
Re: Gibson "Quality"

...
In closing: Luthierie and instrument making has ALWAYS been one of the most ungrateful jobs ever, and this thread including many of the arguments stated herein are a prime example why.... The only reason most luthiers still even practice is pure love of the instrument.... Discussions like this honestly make me and some of my german colleagues regularly question if the average guitarist is even worth the effort of a 50$ Chinese POS, much less a handmade unique.

If you think Gibson´s, Fenders, PRS, Suhrs, Jacksons, Hamers et. al. suck, for whatever reason...Fine, that´s your good right, buy something else... But don´t try to come in here and tell people that have been building quality guitars for longer than half the forum has likely been playing what comprises their job and how much ****ing cheaper they could do it, because you just plain don´t have the knowledge to make that kind of judgement.....

Either way, I´m out of this thread for good before something bad comes of it.... I´ve stated less than half, maybe a quarter total of the the factors, and not even those which are basic human nature and survivalism (not to mention those which are simple economics) have been acknowledged, therefore I see no sense in continuing this discussion...

There are things I´m willing to do, but listening to laymen try to tell lifelong pros how guitars are made, on top with an air of superiority and omniscience that REALLY turns me off (and makes it clear that discussion was futile in the fiorst place).....well, that´s definitely not one of them ;)
 
Last edited:
Re: Gibson "Quality"

I appreciate the insights and the energy of this thread.

Gibson vs. Heritage.

No right or wrong answers here...just perspective that counts...YOURS.

When I went shopping for an single cut, dual HB guitar, first I went to GC and played over a dozen Gibson LP's. Of the bunch, I really liked about two or three. Next, I went to a Heritage dealer and played about the same number of 150's and liked them all. Currently, I own two Heritage guitars. My best friend loves his Gibson 335 and LP and does not care for my Heritage guitars at all. LOL. Perspective.

Gibson's goal is to mass produce, market and distribute their product through high volume retailers. To accomplish this goal, their daily production line, per unit requirements are much higher. As a result, their business model and operational infrastructure support that goal. For instance, having a production line that includes moderate wage employees performing vertical tasks. Heritage, on the other hand, is a relatively small manufacturer, where most line functions are handled by luthiers and/or artisians, and whose capability and focus is to produce significantly fewer units, with high QC, while utilizing a much smaller retail distribution network. Heritage's business is generated through warm market referral activity as opposed to Gibson's national media advertising. Some will argue that when we buy a Gibson, the bad news is that you might have to play several to find one with good to great quality control. That said the good news is that it will probably hold a high percentage of its resale value. Regarding Heritage, some will argue that you are getting a virtually handmade and custom guitar for a price less and a product superior than that of a major name brand competitior. The bad news is that the market of potential customers willing to pay a high resale price for your used Heritage is vertical in nature and not nearly as large as the Gibson resale marketplace.

Not to disrespect this outstanding forum, but if anyone is interested in more information about the Gibson vs. Heritage issue, their is a very insightful thread in the Fender Discussion Page web site, under Miscellaneous, entitled "Heritage Appreciation Thread...What's YOUR Story?"

Please know that this is simply my opinion and that I respect and value everyone's elses in this tread. Thank you for allowing me to share my perspective.

Sincerely,

Westley
 
Last edited:
Back
Top