Going digital Axe Fx/Kemper

Re: Going digital Axe Fx/Kemper

You'll find far more players satisfied with the AxeFx and Kemper than dissatisfied. Countless "tube snobs" have made the conversion. There are many reasons why that may be, but sound is definitely a factor in every case. Likewise, there's still something unique and arguably romantic about the glow and character of analog tubery that no one should be allowed to dismiss.



ka-ching
 
Re: Going digital Axe Fx/Kemper

Kemper as advertised and reported by many is the ultimate tone reproducer. It can reportedly capture any existing tone and reproduce with a high degree of accuracy. Tweaks can be made to refine the tone even more precisely.
Considering this how important is the traditional rig anymore? If I am reading this right a player could by a playable Squire, plug into the tone ready Kemper and send the output to any SS amp with decent speakers. The results would be a perfect sound reproduction of any previous artist or the players choice of a unique sound.
No more investment required in expensive guitars, pickups, pedals, amps...those things are now just collector items, obsolete.

Not exactly, my understanding is that the Kemper captures the amp/speaker/mic (or subset) of the signal chain, there's a reason that (most) guys using them are still using nice guitars too. A Squire with microphonic pickups will still ruin your tone, even with modeling.*



*not saying that all Squire pickups are microphonic or sound bad
 
Re: Going digital Axe Fx/Kemper

What if the Kemper player has never had first hand experience with a tube amp?
A 5E3 Tweed Deluxe is my reference standard so this player:
never has plugged his strat in to the 5E3 and rolled the volume up to 2 or 3 and heard the warm full tone;
never went through the 5 switch selections here and at each step and really heard a strat played through the amp it was designed for;
never rolled the volume up to 6 and heard the creamy overdrive begin;
never took it to 8 and heard the natural complex distortion;
never taken it to 12 and heard the harmonics of the totally saturated tube amp;
never played with the many facets of controlled feedback that can be achieved in this 8 to 12 range?
This player sits in front of the knobs and buttons that offer 50,000 sounds. What is his point of reference, the starting point for finding his sound? Going through 50,000 options one by one?
It seems that before the Kemper the player needs to spend a little time as an apprentice, working with a tube amp.
 
Re: Going digital Axe Fx/Kemper

Not exactly, my understanding is that the Kemper captures the amp/speaker/mic (or subset) of the signal chain, there's a reason that (most) guys using them are still using nice guitars too. A Squire with microphonic pickups will still ruin your tone, even with modeling.*



*not saying that all Squire pickups are microphonic or sound bad

Read quite a few threads on this before I posted. It is currently a topic with a lot of strong feelings both ways. However, it was my impression that the people who had the most actual experience using the Kemper were of the opinion that the actual tone from the guitar is not very critical. Like I said there is a whole lotta talk about this out there if your interested. I am leaning strongly towards buying a Kemper to find out for myself....they seem to hold there valued extremely well at this point so it is a low risk proposition.
 
Re: Going digital Axe Fx/Kemper

Acoustic guitars? Checked the AGF, Kemper has full line of exacting models. Granddad's Martin D28 can go in the curio cabinet too.

Anybody using a Kemper would’ve probably had a crappy acoustic tone even if they used a real one, so no big deal. Also, anybody who would be satisfied with a modeled acoustic tone from an electric guitar shouldn’t be touching grandad’s D28.
 
Re: Going digital Axe Fx/Kemper

Sweet! B3 and the Nord off to the bin!

Whoa.....there goes a Klon pedal out the window, Kemper does it again. Now if I can only figure out what these little chrome knobs at the skinny end of the guitar do...
 
Re: Going digital Axe Fx/Kemper

The Kemper is a cool piece, but I just don't need dozens different tones. It was difficult enough finding a sound that works for me. If I purchased another Kemper, I suppose it would be for ease of transport. I wouldn't let anyone see it though... I'd hide the Kemper, and use a combo prop. :)
 
Re: Going digital Axe Fx/Kemper

See, for me, the reason I went to Fractal is that I hate carrying amps anymore. So I get the tones I like, without all of the weight. I still love my amps, but recording & live I use the Fractal.
 
Re: Going digital Axe Fx/Kemper

If the Kemper can profile the exact tone and response of my Ampeg GVT15 and GVT5, I would definitely consider getting another. A friend sold all of his cherished amplifiers after purchasing a Kemper. What happens when/if Kemper closes its doors? A Kemper is nothing more than a glorified computer system with proprietary components. Same goes with AxeFx. It's a cool toy, but hardly something that should be considered as a replacement for real tube amplification.
 
Last edited:
Re: Going digital Axe Fx/Kemper

What if the Kemper player has never had first hand experience with a tube amp?
A 5E3 Tweed Deluxe is my reference standard so this player:
never has plugged his strat in to the 5E3 and rolled the volume up to 2 or 3 and heard the warm full tone;
never went through the 5 switch selections here and at each step and really heard a strat played through the amp it was designed for;
never rolled the volume up to 6 and heard the creamy overdrive begin;
never took it to 8 and heard the natural complex distortion;
never taken it to 12 and heard the harmonics of the totally saturated tube amp;
never played with the many facets of controlled feedback that can be achieved in this 8 to 12 range?
This player sits in front of the knobs and buttons that offer 50,000 sounds. What is his point of reference, the starting point for finding his sound? Going through 50,000 options one by one?
It seems that before the Kemper the player needs to spend a little time as an apprentice, working with a tube amp.
Or just aim for the sound you have in mind? You know, use some creativity. I don't need to play every vintage amp to appreciate a great modeler.

Sent from my BlackBerry using Tapatalk
 
Re: Going digital Axe Fx/Kemper

Well, even if a company goes out of business, it doesn't mean the modeler doesn't have great sounds.
 
Re: Going digital Axe Fx/Kemper

I've had a Helix for a couple years. And when I started playing in a band again about a month ago, it's what I ended up using.

And my amp collection has been dwindling. Sold the Splawn last weekend, traded in the Supersonic today, and I'm loaning my Triple Rec to the other guitarist in my band while his Peavey XXX is on the fritz...and I'd just as soon sell it to him. I'll keep my JVM because it's the first amp I modded and my VTM120 because it was my very first amp.

But I don't run my Helix the way some do. I still run through real guitar cabs and I use a tube poweramp. They add the little something that I feel that my Helix needs.
 
Re: Going digital Axe Fx/Kemper

Some people like to run their modeler into guitar cabs. I don't really like the coloration of guitar cabs, or a guitar preamp or poweramp (If I have a choice).
 
Re: Going digital Axe Fx/Kemper

Some people like to run their modeler into guitar cabs. I don't really like the coloration of guitar cabs, or a guitar preamp or poweramp (If I have a choice).

Yeah, I tried the stock cabs and IRs. Even bought a pair of PA speakers to run through. And they sound good for what they are, but real cabs still do it for me. And I do want to go with lighter options. The tube poweramp I'm using is a heavy mofo. So something like a Matrix or a Powerstage 700 is in my future, and I plan on switching over to neo speakers eventually as well.
 
Re: Going digital Axe Fx/Kemper

I'd be interested to try the new Line6 Powercabs, but they are a little expensive right now. I hear that they work really well with modelers.
 
Back
Top