HAMER vs. HERITAGE

Re: HAMER vs. HERITAGE

you're gonna LOVE that guitar Terry!!!!!!

i'm super JEALOUS!!!

NEW STUFF ROCKS!!!!!! :headbang: :headbang: :headbang:
 
Re: HAMER vs. HERITAGE

"The waiting is the hardest part"!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Now truer words have ever been spoken/sung!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :32: :32: :32:
 
Re: HAMER vs. HERITAGE

Nice score gear ho. Couldn't even wait to look at the Heritages huh? I'm sure you will love the new guitar, and to answer your question....yes, you've hit the all time GAS low. Buying a guitar just for a set of pickups.

Welcome to the depths of hell.
 
Re: HAMER vs. HERITAGE

Lewguitar said:
I don't think thier designs are graceful and the way they play just feels stiff to me.

Are you referring to the the headstock and the stock hardware Lew? Because the cutaway and everything is identical to my LP or my dads 69.

I really like the Monacos, but the body doesn't do it for me. The way hamer does their top cutaway has always weirded me out.

Yes I said weirded, verbing weirds words.

Luke
 
Last edited:
Re: HAMER vs. HERITAGE

Jeff_H said:
Nice score gear ho. Couldn't even wait to look at the Heritages huh? I'm sure you will love the new guitar, and to answer your question....yes, you've hit the all time GAS low. Buying a guitar just for a set of pickups.

Welcome to the depths of hell.


Pitiful, ain't it??? Trying to keep up with the (Gear)Jonesers will get ya' broke!!!! :rolleyes: :laugh2:
 
Last edited:
Re: HAMER vs. HERITAGE

Nice choice, the Studio is a killer guitar. The reason Hamer makes the Monaco with that weird looking cutaway is that it allows them to use a larger dovetail joint. I agree that it looks wrong, but it's a tonally advantageous design. If you've ever seen a Gibson tenon, it narrows at a certain point to avoid having that extra bit of wood in the cutaway. Hamer chooses not to do that.

Ryan
 
Re: HAMER vs. HERITAGE

Thanks for all the input fellas...It's on the way & I'm off all weekend!!!!!!!!! :32: :32: :32: :32: :32: :32: :32:
 
Re: HAMER vs. HERITAGE

Luke Duke said:
Are you referring to the the headstock and the stock hardware Lew? Because the cutaway and everything is identical to my LP or my dads 69.

...

Lucas Minton

Hi, I have registered again after a while. I was registered in the old forum sometime ago.

Luke Duke: I own a Heritage H-150CM and I have noticed that it's body shape is not identical to that of a Gibson LP. I don´t have currently any Gibson to compare with side by side but I find from pics a slight difference in the cutaway, in the shape of the single 'horn' to be precise:

The horn in a Heritage is more rounded, less pointed than the Gibson one. It's as if the Heritage horn had been shaved.

The visual effect is that the horn in a Heritage points toward the outside of the body while the horn in a Gibson LP points toward the headstock, parallel to the neck.

It is my impression and again, it's a slight difference.

Correct me if I am wrong.
 
Re: HAMER vs. HERITAGE

I've had both makes of guitars and I don't think for the price you can go wrong with either choice - in my experience I found the Hamers to have that little something extra that I enjoyed - for me they felt a little better and sounded a little better.
 
Re: HAMER vs. HERITAGE

FPA_687 said:
Hi, I have registered again after a while. I was registered in the old forum sometime ago.

Luke Duke: I own a Heritage H-150CM and I have noticed that it's body shape is not identical to that of a Gibson LP. I don´t have currently any Gibson to compare with side by side but I find from pics a slight difference in the cutaway, in the shape of the single 'horn' to be precise:

The horn in a Heritage is more rounded, less pointed than the Gibson one. It's as if the Heritage horn had been shaved.

The visual effect is that the horn in a Heritage points toward the outside of the body while the horn in a Gibson LP points toward the headstock, parallel to the neck.

It is my impression and again, it's a slight difference.

Correct me if I am wrong.


Hmm, interesting, maybe it's a difference in years? Maybe mine was custom, I honestly can't tell a difference.

Luke
 
Re: HAMER vs. HERITAGE

FPA_687 said:
Hi, I have registered again after a while. I was registered in the old forum sometime ago.


The horn in a Heritage is more rounded, less pointed than the Gibson one. It's as if the Heritage horn had been shaved.

The visual effect is that the horn in a Heritage points toward the outside of the body while the horn in a Gibson LP points toward the headstock, parallel to the neck.

.

You are correct.
The H150cm horn is shaped different than a Gibson LP.

Congrats Puckboy,
That look like an awesome Hamer Studio.

Kent
 
Re: HAMER vs. HERITAGE

You wanna guess what my preference would have been?

Congratulations on the score, T. I look forward to seeing pics.
 
Re: HAMER vs. HERITAGE

kherman said:
You are correct.
The H150cm horn is shaped different than a Gibson LP.

Congrats Puckboy,
That look like an awesome Hamer Studio.

Kent

COMPLETELY off topic, but I live in Franklin too! Small world, eh? :offtopic:
 
Re: HAMER vs. HERITAGE

btw...that's a great looking tele you've got in your album!!! :laugh2: :dance: :32: :laugh2:
 
Re: HAMER vs. HERITAGE

Luke Duke said:
Are you referring to the the headstock and the stock hardware Lew? Because the cutaway and everything is identical to my LP or my dads 69.

Yes on the headstock. I was thinking more of some of the Heritage designs made before they started copying the Les Paul body shape so closely.

( I wonder how they get away with that? Gibson sued PRS over the Single Cut because, supposedly, someone might confuse it for a Les Paul!)

A buddy of mine recently picked up a very expensive Heritage Johnny Smith. I have no idea what he sees in this guitar as it is one very expensive but very stiff playing and stiff sounding guitar.

Tight, neat construction and well detailed...but just no magic. I've never really liked most new guitars, but I do like Hamers. Just personal preference...I like the neck shape and the fingerboard radius and they play beautifully for me.

And the Hamers use Duncan Pickups! :laugh2:

Lew
 
Last edited:
Re: HAMER vs. HERITAGE

Jeffrec said:
They're both great guitars, but I'm a huge Hamer fan. That Monoco is to die for!
DEFINITELY!!!!

everyone take sides


HAMER IS AT WAR WITH HERITAGE!!!

Hamer :firing: --------- :rocket: Heritage

j/k of course! like i said...i've yet to play a heritage, but i've played some Pauls...and alot of other "high end" guitars...i've yet to find a better looking/playing/sounding guitar than a Hamer Monaco Elite!!!!! it's just plain Buttah!!! :32: :32: :32: :32:

my philosophy on things like this (if and when i ever get enough money to do it?!) is to just buy one of each anyways!!!
 
Re: HAMER vs. HERITAGE

Hoss said:
btw...that's a great looking tele you've got in your album!!! :laugh2: :dance: :32: :laugh2:

Thanks Mike.....I got it from a buddy of mine!!! :13:
 
Re: HAMER vs. HERITAGE

Hoss said:
my philosophy on things like this (if and when i ever get enough money to do it?!) is to just buy one of each anyways!!!


Now, that's the way to go! :smoker:
 
Re: HAMER vs. HERITAGE

OOOOOOhhhhhh...it's here in town out for delivery.....

........And me off ALL weekend.

Forgive me if I'm not around the next few days; I'll be annoying the Mrs.

I guess I'll have to take time off to go to dinner & a movie or something for our 6 year anniversary Saturday!!!! :22: :blackeye: :yell: :laugh2: :burnout:
 
Back
Top