Re: Here we go again...Sg vs telecaster
That's kind of my point exactly though. You've just described the sound of a SuperStrat, Flying V, Explorer, and half a dozen other guitars I could name. Strats, Teles, LPs all have distinct, unique tonal characteristics. SGs, to my ears, don't.
This is from Gibson not being in touch with the market. Had they responded to the Super Strats 25 years ago, with a HSH or HSS "Super SG" (with P-90's, a 5-way & a Floyd), we'd be associating that sound with SG's, and not all the other models that filled the void. SG's
should have had a major rebirth in the metal era, but because the design wasn't updated for the times, they got pushed aside.
Gibson went way off track with the SG in the early 1970's, and butchered the design (it bombed with the public). It wasn't until the mid 1980's that they finally went back to the original 1960's specs.
Had they been able to multi-task, they could have simultaneously introduced Super SG's, and got a big market share between the traditional and modern SG designs.
SG's are one of the great electric designs, but never received the popularity the should due to some poor decisions & missed opportunities. Many more people would consider the SG a versatile, high-profile guitar if Gibson would have been more creative and done some things differently. Don't blame the guitar. The world changed it's view of Strats due to Hendrix. When the SG went "ugly" for about 15 years, it lost fans and player endorsements. Hendrix played an SG Custom live and in the studio; had that been his main guitar, many people's opinons of Strats & SG's would be different today.