Demanic
PenultimateTone Member
Well, Petrucci.So you are trying to tell me a 9:30-minute guitar solo is scripted?
Sent from my SM-A115A using Tapatalk
Well, Petrucci.So you are trying to tell me a 9:30-minute guitar solo is scripted?
If you take some of the most recognizable improved pieces of rock let's say Silver Wheels and Eruption. There are different themes and phrases that are strung together but there is no way Wilson or VanHalen could have stitched those riffs together if they had not played and practiced them many times over and over. Both performances are off-the-cuff improvisations, but both performers are going to build the piece of music based on their prowess of the instrument, song structure, and musical knowledge. Most improv is a variation of a theme. Nancy never played Silver Wheels the same way twice.
“I walked out to use the restroom or get a coffee on the outside of Sunset Sound, and I heard him playing. It sounded like something you could only play on an organ, like a Bach fugue. I couldn’t believe it was coming from a guitar. I was like, “What is that?” He was like, “Oh, it’s nothing. Just something I warm up with before a show.” I yelled at Donn, “Roll tape!” And he said [flatly], “I’m already rolling.” He heard me talking to Ed.”
Things like muscle memory and using scales you learnt before don't detract from an improvised piece being truly improvised at all. That's like saying a chef is uncreative cause he uses carrots and onions and potatoes & steak and shouldnt have used ingredients of any sort to be truly creative, or an author should'nt have used words that he learnt before etc...
As long as you're doing something different that is'nt scripted each time it's total improvisation.
I guess the evidence might be if there is any footage of EVH using eye contact to tell the band when his solo was over or not.
Woah, this has been a lot more responses and reading then I've expected.
The key takeaway that I'm getting however is that there are multiple different ways to learn, and so long as I consistently and intentionally try to improve I will get there.
You're forgetting Syd Barrett. He reached a point where he would never play the same thing twice.Which is a great point and yet another part of improvisation that has yet to be discussed, communication.
As stated agreed to by most, when improving alone, you have the freedom to do whatever you like. In an ensemble setting, there are physical, verbal, and musical communications that give you cues as to where the music is going. It is challenging to improvise in an ensemble setting without some musical knowledge.
In a jam, you need to know where to get in and out of your solo. In most cases, that will be a verse or chorus. At that point, you pass off the solo to the next musician. Typically the band leader will look at or nod to the next soloist.
If the band has a featured player who is taking an extended solo, that player might alter the length of the solo each night. In a lot of cases, there is a return to the melody or a musical cue that tells the band, "I am done. Let's get back to the song. I am guessing Eruption live ends on the same riff or divebomb, signaling the rest of the band EVH is done with his solo.
Understanding the framework of what is going to be played is critical. A band member will "call" "Body & Soul in Bb as a waltz". Or "All The Things You Are in Eb in 7" If you do not have knowledge of the song, time signatures, and keys, you will be lost. A musician might call a "Chicago shuffle in G" in a Blues setting."
Very rarely is improvisation done without structure or understanding outside of some rare avant-garde music. Even with the most avant-garde improvisational Jazz, if you ask the musician what they just played, they will respond with a song title. You will never hear them say we just made that up.
You are going straight to hell for making me watch that.