I have never understood why this is. (SG Content)

Re: I have never understood why this is. (SG Content)

Seriously,
If you can't say what you want to say with 22 frets, 24 frets won't help.

+1. The 23rd and 24th frets are so narrow, there's not much you can do with them. Players seem pleased with 22 fret SG's; I have a few of them myself, and don't think I'm missing anything. I'm not restricted in my playing in the least.
 
Re: I have never understood why this is. (SG Content)

In this case, I'd side with ItsaBass for the answer. Apparently most guitarists (myself excluded) are incredibly stuck, wanting things the way they were 50 years ago.
It's stupid but that's just the way it is...

Maybe some of us, most of us, don't perceive any tangible benefit from 24 fret guitars. Not really an improvement in our eyes. We're not going to replace what we have now (and love) for 2 extra frets, that we'd rarely, if ever use. That would be stupid.

Electric guitars were mostly perfected in the 1950's; everything since then has been minor modifications, 'tweaks'. Not everyone agrees that every one of these modifications has been a step forward. Most of us aren't flocking to 24 fret guitars, active PU's, onboard effects, and robot tuners; not because we're hopelessly old-fashioned or brain-dead, but because we've thought it thru, and either find them unnecessary and not worth the additional expense, or because we think they're (and I'm using a mucisian's term here) 'crap'.
 
Re: I have never understood why this is. (SG Content)

The SG is one guitar that I wouldn't see any harm in just converting to 24 frets across the board.

If you don't want to use those two frets, don't. They're not gonna hurt you by just being there.

Literally nothing else about the design would change. Nothing would move. It would just replace the plastic between the neck and neck pickup with fretboard.

I don't usually use 24 fret guitars, but I wouldn't have a problem with a 24 fret SG.
 
Re: I have never understood why this is. (SG Content)

I tell ya, there have been a few times where having those two extra frets would have been handy. I have gone 'beyond' the 22nd fret only to realize it too late. This is due to me being used to feeling the inside of the cutaway against my hand on my Strat so I know I'm at the last fret. Not so on the SG. Hitting the "invisible 23rd fret" is no fun...LOL.
 
Re: I have never understood why this is. (SG Content)

Thanks god there's ESP, Jackson, Carvin and Ibanez for those of us who need our 24 fret fix. :headbang:
 
Re: I have never understood why this is. (SG Content)

50th-Anniversary-SG-Standard-24.jpg




They just need to extend the inlays. Just one more.
 
Last edited:
Re: I have never understood why this is. (SG Content)

Alright Gibson is offering a 50th anniversary 24 fret standard:

SG50MAECH1-Finish-Shot-jpg.aspx


Compared to the 22 fret standard:

SGSEBCH1-Finish-Shot-jpg.aspx
 
Re: I have never understood why this is. (SG Content)

Man, threads like this really piss me off. Guy asks a simple question and a bunch of dudes storm in, ignore the facts and start mouthing off about their own personal tastes and it turns into another young vs old, blues vs metal, my tastes vs your tastes parade of bull****.

Some people need to realise that their opinions just don't ****ing matter and shut up about them when they're irrelevant to the purpose of the thread.

I don't own a 24 fret guitar and I don't really have any burning desire to, either. On a guitar design like an SG where their inclusion makes absolutely ZERO difference to people who aren't going to use them, I think they're a good idea and they should be included.

What, none of you guys ever hit a full-step bend on the 22nd fret? You don't think it just might be cool to hit that note with a slide or a hammer-on or a tap? Just for a little variety? Even if you barely ever use it, since when was having more options a bad thing?
 
Re: I have never understood why this is. (SG Content)

I tell ya, there have been a few times where having those two extra frets would have been handy. I have gone 'beyond' the 22nd fret only to realize it too late. This is due to me being used to feeling the inside of the cutaway against my hand on my Strat so I know I'm at the last fret. Not so on the SG. Hitting the "invisible 23rd fret" is no fun...LOL.

I've done that once or twice. Then when it happens you feel like an idiot.

A whole lot

I agree kam. :flowers1:
 
Re: I have never understood why this is. (SG Content)

What, none of you guys ever hit a full-step bend on the 22nd fret? You don't think it just might be cool to hit that note with a slide or a hammer-on or a tap? Just for a little variety? Even if you barely ever use it, since when was having more options a bad thing?

Word.

I mean, one of the main features of the thing is upper fret access, so more frets would just seem to be an extension of that idea.
 
Re: I have never understood why this is. (SG Content)

I don't own a 24 fret guitar and I don't really have any burning desire to, either. On a guitar design like an SG where their inclusion makes absolutely ZERO difference to people who aren't going to use them, I think they're a good idea and they should be included.

What, none of you guys ever hit a full-step bend on the 22nd fret? You don't think it just might be cool to hit that note with a slide or a hammer-on or a tap? Just for a little variety? Even if you barely ever use it, since when was having more options a bad thing?

We are guitarist. Set in our ways. I would be willing to bet that MOST people who look at SGs dont want or need 24 frets. Many would see it as blasphemy since that wasnt how they originally made them. I personally think the 22 fret model looks better with the pickguard there.

I would also be willing to bet that most guys who want 24 fret necks arent very likely to look at SGs, but more so at superstrat guitars.

So putting 24 frets on ALL SGs would likely cost more sales than it would gain.
And thats your answer. Money. Gibson obviously feel they will make more money with their current practices.
 
Re: I have never understood why this is. (SG Content)

We are guitarist. Set in our ways. I would be willing to bet that MOST people who look at SGs dont want or need 24 frets. Many would see it as blasphemy since that wasnt how they originally made them. I personally think the 22 fret model looks better with the pickguard there.

I would also be willing to bet that most guys who want 24 fret necks arent very likely to look at SGs, but more so at superstrat guitars.

So putting 24 frets on ALL SGs would likely cost more sales than it would gain.
And thats your answer. Money. Gibson obviously feel they will make more money with their current practices.

Lots of good points and I think you're pretty much spot on. Which is a shame.

I just want to note for the record that I'm not one of the guitarists you're talking about and I wouldn't have it any other way. :)
 
Re: I have never understood why this is. (SG Content)

Steve, I don't think he meant any offense, just saying that when the older guys were young they were listening to the now-old guys, SRV, JB, Hendrix, Clapton, etc. and now, kids that are buying their first guitar (some cheapo Ibanez or a br00taLz jackson JS) are doing it so they can sound like their idols from Asking Alexandria (Barf.), A Day to Remember (Yuck.), Avenged Sevenfold (Seriously?), and the crappy like.
I know that when I picked up a guitar, I had no idea who Jason Becker was or why I should care, I just wanted to sound like "That one guy from the band Muse, Matt I think."
When you're young and naive you think "Twenty-four frets?! Alright! I'm gonna rawk the house down now! Can't wait to see how I'm going to add a 24th fret E to my power chords but I'll figure it out somehow!"
That's exactly what I thought when I bought my Jackson SLSMG. I love the guitar to death, but I actually play my Squier more.

So yeah, the short of the matter is, new music is being promoted and kids are picking the first influence to base their sound on. And if their up-and-coming idol plays a 24-fret guitar, you can bet they're going to as well.
Tony Iommi isn't a new artist. And it is not just wanting to sound like someone but the extra versatility which is slight form a 24-Fret guitar. But my main point is that The SG is already made to fit an extra 2-frets on the neck.
 
Re: I have never understood why this is. (SG Content)

To Agileguy_101,
I guess that's why Jeff Beck sucks so bad. Of course! he's in his 60's.
What was the world thinking?
Almost all of humanity calls him the greatest living guitarist.
What could we all be thinking? He sure looks like a fuddy duddy every time he blows the lid off every venue he has ever played. He looks so silly getting standing ovations from the Crossroads Shows along truly great young players like J. Bonamassa who can play the blues scale faster and more often than even veteran youngsters like Johnny Lang.
You must be forgetting that you and your buddies wouldn't be playing without the knowledge of all those fuddy duddy's pass on.
Pagganinni is dead too. So he must suck as well.
Please someone else take over, attitudes like this make me tired.
For all I know this guy might be goading someone like me on purpose,for fun,
no one could be that stupid about age. No one who can play.
Don't bother Agile, I am too old to web-duke it out with you.
Oh yeah, Hendrix would be in his 60's also, good thing he passed on, he would be so mortified by insults from people like you,
love, steve b.

Hey Steve - take a chill pill.

Did you read my post? I didn't say that I felt that way. It's just what I see as a general trend from people under 25 or so that are just now picking up guitar, or just started within the last year or two.

For the record, I that's the kind of music I like. I actually know who Paganini was, and I can even spell his name correctly - something that even you couldn't do. So don't attack me just because you misinterpreted what I said.

Better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
 
Re: I have never understood why this is. (SG Content)

The SG is one guitar that I wouldn't see any harm in just converting to 24 frets across the board.

If you don't want to use those two frets, don't. They're not gonna hurt you by just being there.

Literally nothing else about the design would change. Nothing would move. It would just replace the plastic between the neck and neck pickup with fretboard.

I don't usually use 24 fret guitars, but I wouldn't have a problem with a 24 fret SG.

I've usually avoided 24 fret guitars, because the style of guitar they come on doesn't appeal to me.

Then, I bought my SG Diablo and it's such a great guitar that I barely even think about the extra 2 frets, even though it is nice to grab a high E on occasion. Also, the Diablo neck is a full 50's neck, so it doesn't exactly have that shred feel. But it's a fast and killer neck.

But there's one benefit I notice on my 24 fret SG. The fact that there's more wood at the joint adds some boldness to the tone and gives the SG a very solid feel. That, coupled with the fat 50's neck.

All I can say is that I'm now used to the control layout on a carved top SG, and there's no difference in feel or sound having 2 extra frets.

GibsonSGDiablo.jpg
 
Back
Top