Myaccount876
Amira-Maker
Re: i never realized how stupid of a design the strat has until...
Not bothered by it at all. Play it just like any other guitar.
Not bothered by it at all. Play it just like any other guitar.
The volume knob placement is the EXACT reason Strats never caught on, if you can dig that.
it's not about tone, rather design. does a strat sound amazing? if you have a good one, yes. but is it a good design for our modern needs? no. for then time it was great, but anno 2013 it is hopelessly flawed. the issue at hand, though, is that it can be improved but not without changing the tone of the product. it is such an iconic tone, nearly every change will compromise that tone. that is why all the greats adopted the strat. not because it looks or plays so well. because it sounds so well. that is the truth of the matter.PS. a les paul, SG, super400, tele, jaguar and jazz master are equally flawed.
it's not about tone, rather design. does a strat sound amazing? if you have a good one, yes. but is it a good design for our modern needs? no. for then time it was great, but anno 2013 it is hopelessly flawed. the issue at hand, though, is that it can be improved but not without changing the tone of the product. it is such an iconic tone, nearly every change will compromise that tone. that is why all the greats adopted the strat. not because it looks or plays so well. because it sounds so well. that is the truth of the matter.PS. a les paul, SG, super400, tele, jaguar and jazz master are equally flawed.
I tend to agree, but it begs the question... What is the "ideal" guitar design as of 2013?
Some one who didn't actually play guitar.
it's not about tone, rather design. does a strat sound amazing? if you have a good one, yes. but is it a good design for our modern needs? no. for then time it was great, but anno 2013 it is hopelessly flawed. the issue at hand, though, is that it can be improved but not without changing the tone of the product. it is such an iconic tone, nearly every change will compromise that tone. that is why all the greats adopted the strat. not because it looks or plays so well. because it sounds so well. that is the truth of the matter.PS. a les paul, SG, super400, tele, jaguar and jazz master are equally flawed.
from a design perspective? if I had To go purely by design (ergonomics, stability), I would say Strandberg, Parker, Aristides... tonally, I would not know because well... just read my previous post![]()
I think Gibson might have an argument with you. I see les Paul copies just as much if not more that strat copies.
Im not an anti strat guy at all, but give me a good LP over a strat any day. I dont need belly cuts or ergonmics and actually imo, a LP has just as much upper fret access as a traditional strat. The horn on a strat is just as forbidding to me on a strat as the chunky heel is on a LP. Now superstrats like a Jackson is where the design was perfected.


