Re: Is Jimmy Page the most overrated guitarist?
lmao!!!!!!
Jimmy Page is so cool, when sheep go to sleep they count him.
lmao!!!!!!
Jimmy Page is so cool, when sheep go to sleep they count him.
The reason they get better (? - subjective..) is because they build on what came before.
And I'm pretty sure you can have genius's in musical genres that are'nt classical or Jazz..
Technical ability is'nt the be all and end all anyway..so no...by todays standards ..he is'nt overated. (Try playing The Rain Song and sounding remotely as good as he does)
Why? because today's standards are actually piss poor.
What you have today are a bunch of ****ty bands that copy everything off each other from their overall sound/production to their 'songwriting' (ie..chugg-chugg-chugg *breakdown* chugg-chugg-chugg *widdly looped arpeggio* chugg-chugg-chugg) to their licks/riffs, instruments, image, tuff-guy who misses his girlfriend stage antics and pretty much everything else. Literally nothing is impressive (and certainly not innovative) about today's "metal"..
As for the djent brigade of 'shredder's' these days ..sadly, boring as **** again. Same thing..no variety..little individuality..same licks..same melodies (usually Satriani &/or Petrucci's rip-off stuff..) ..same plastic/synthetic tone, same list of "do's & don't's", same bored facial expressions = same lack of excitement listening to the whole bunch of them.
or this ?
Morrison? Lol
anyone watched this vid :
You don't know what you are talking about. That progression came out of a Mel Bay Guitar Book published in the late 40s and is at least verifiably hundreds of years older. It was a standard ingrained in all young guitarists subconsciously in the same way the Sweet Child Of Mine riff was taken from a standard exercise by Slash.
By the way Led Zepplin won the court case largely on the grounds that this is just building on musical movements and foundations that have been shared since the Renaissance era.
I think someone needs to explain to you how sharing and co-opting art works.
Musicians are a subconscious summary of all the music they have consumed in their life (including in the womb) -it is inescapable
So if an artist shares anything -it is no longer theirs -it is now part of others, and it is doubtful that it ever was theirs as it is the culmination of the art that has been shared with them.
There is so little "original" -everything is permutations of foundational ideas mixed and represented.
-and citing court cases pressed by record companies and decided by juries who have no concept isn't proof either.
1st, try to talk like an adult, The video is there, so I don't know how your "You don't know what you are talking about" response might be perceived in order to make some (minimal) sense
2nd, when someone asks a question like : "what's your opinion on this?, have you seen this?", it doesn't mean that he immediately wears his helmet and full armor and takes position for combat. I might very well mean that he simply asks a question. Ever thought of that?
3rd, you yourself downpayed the role of outcome of the trial so it would be wise not to use this argument.
(western)Music only has 7 notes + semitones, this is inevitable, but the difference is between "modification" and copying 90+% of the original.
As much of a Page fan as I was when I was younger, I think of his era (mid 60s-mid 70s), Jeff Beck was a much better player. His recorded output could be spotty, and the production on his albums wasn't always great (though I love Blow by Blow and Wired), and he certainly didn't have the riffs and power of Page, his intensity and musical vocabulary was more advanced (and is, still).
These days, I love Physical Graffiti and III. Both aren't filled to the top with overplayed songs on classic rock radio (and as a Led Zep fan, if I never hear II or IV again in my life, I will be just fine). Both have amazing production, and both are creative peaks to me.
Led Zeppelin is an odd band to me. They were one of my greatest influences in my early-to-mid teens. Playing through Baldur's Gate 2 for the first time whilst blasting through the Latter Days compilation album is forever going to be a dear, dear memory to me; Tony Iommi had more to do with me starting to play guitar, but Page certainly did a lot as well. At some point, however, the appeal wore off. It wasn't from overexposure, but I grew out that sound at some point, in favour of slicker, more polished, more 80s sounding production values. They will forever be dear to me, but they no longer light a fire up my arse the way a band like 70s Rainbow does.
I don't think anybody can argue with this. Beck is so fantastic technically.
but Page's legacy is a prolific influence not guitar technique so I still don't think he's "overrated"
People are rating Page for the wrong reasons if his wasted fumbling and comical bends are their measure of him.
Gentlemen before we get too fired up over this topic may I mention one thing? I was alive during the Led Zep period, and I've seen Page play live. For many of you this music was before your time, and it's hard to relate to a different time, a time without the internet, and when rock stars didn't have reality TV shows. We never saw the prince of freaking darkness on his sofa trying and failing to figure out the Direct TV remote.
In those days these guys had an aura, and were seen as mythical beings. To see them only in retrospect in today's world, one doesn't get the entire experience.
Having been there I can say this: Over rated? Perhaps. However a guy that calls himself "The edge" is the all-time king of over rated. He has no peers. I'll take Page with the violin bow over anything Mr. Edge has ever played.
I have been a hard rock and metal guy all my life. Ive watched the trends.. come..and go.... I loved 80s metal and yes, alot of it got schlocky, and once it started selling, the quality of new bands coming out went downhill. Were just parodys of the originals... (took about a decade to fade) 90's, we had grunge. more bands came along in the same vein, parodys of the originals... Numetal. Never got much into it as Im not much of a rap fan... but bands trying to cash in.. NOW... most of the stuff out now.... Went from 0-100 almost overnight. everytime I hear or read about a hot new band, I check em out. Bored stiff immediately. sounded just the same. downtuned guitars, same sludgy riffs, same growling vocal. Now, the hot new trend is female lead singers, but same style of music.
Few bands have caught my interest in recent years. A7X for one, cuz they have tasty guitar playing and actual singing. I kinda like motionless in white. just cuz they are alil different.
But, mostly these days, its the originals, Beatles, Zepp , cream
signed,
Old Guy on Soapbox
As much of a Page fan as I was when I was younger, I think of his era (mid 60s-mid 70s), Jeff Beck was a much better player. His recorded output could be spotty, and the production on his albums wasn't always great (though I love Blow by Blow and Wired), and he certainly didn't have the riffs and power of Page, his intensity and musical vocabulary was more advanced (and is, still).
Beck had/has riffs and power that Page never could touch. The Jeff Beck group demonstrates this and Blow by Blow underlines it. Beck choose an artists course for his playing and is still painting gorgeous musical pictures that don't need to be riffy and power soaked...that is how it seems to me...
Page was the basic top 40s player that influenced millions of guitarists...take him out of the history of rock and you find a huge empty spot...
Clapton, Beck and Page each in their own way set the course...others followed...maybe???