STRATDELUXER97 said:I've read where they actually were using the 6550 tubes in Hendrix's amps to keep it tighter? Not sure to the truth on this? Hendrix had alot of problems using the amps back and forth between here and the UK also with mains voltages and transformer problems...I also heard he used the 30 watt "Bass" speakers? It'd be cool to really know the real facts.
Rich_S said:The background on this amp is that there was a guy in England a year or so ago who listed an old Marshall on eBay, purported to be an ex-Hendrix amp. The documentation was pretty solid, and it caused quite a stir. Before the auction closed, Marshall got into the act. They apparently were convinced that the amp was authentic, and came to an "arrangement" with the seller to gain possession of the Hendrix head.
Their examination of that head is the basis for the reissue. I suspect that the "mods" are just narrowing down variables assosiated with the manufacturing variances that were common back then. Amps weren't always built exactly to the schematic, and the only way to find out what a particular amp is, is to look inside.
+1, and a much higher price tag at thatshredaholic said:The Jimi Hendrix Marshall RI is just the JTM45/100 with a 33k/500pf tonestack (instead of 56k/250pf).
Rich_S said:The background on this amp is that there was a guy in England a year or so ago who listed an old Marshall on eBay, purported to be an ex-Hendrix amp. The documentation was pretty solid, and it caused quite a stir. Before the auction closed, Marshall got into the act. They apparently were convinced that the amp was authentic, and came to an "arrangement" with the seller to gain possession of the Hendrix head.
Gearjoneser said:I like the look of that Jimi Hendrix Marshall, but I'd really love to have a 40th Anniversary stack...the JTM 45/100
![]()
Gearjoneser said:You mean you aren't willing to sell your car for a handwired Marshall amp?
What kind of GASser are you anyway?!! LOL